If you believe this story the only thing it's proving is they tested a contaminate. Like smoke from a fire. We know the age of carbon 14 based on a direct comparison of carbon-14 levels in the sample with tree ring or cave-deposit carbon-14 levels of a known age. Unless you have evidence tree rings get more or less than 1 ring a year your argument against it isn't valid.

If you believe this story the only thing it's proving is they tested a contaminate. Like smoke from a fire. We know the age of carbon 14 based on a direct comparison of carbon-14 levels in the sample with tree ring or cave-deposit carbon-14 levels of a known age. Unless you have evidence tree rings get more or less than 1 ring a year your argument against it isn't valid.

I bet you're one of those maroons that think fossils have carbon 14.