Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I’m not sure I’m understanding your question correctly, but if it is what I think it is there are some reconciliations for the contradiction.

Imagine if you will, a world where two parties disagree, both parties make the same claim, both parties are right in some ways, and missing the mark in others.

How does that reconcile? In this case, I believe it can.

In my opinion, both Jew and Gentile can be Israel, while both claimed Jew and claimed Christian can also NOT be Israel, because the dividing line is the actions taken and God’s judgment of the heart behind them.

“Jew” and “Israel” are also both highly overloaded words, which makes them both very difficult to communicate with - to intend a meaning, and to have that meaning be received.

Why do the rabbis declare Jesus an antimessiah? What are the arguments for “Jesus” (not his name) being the messiah? Which points are valid from either side? Did anyone miss a valid objection? Do we have to take either side as all-or-nothing or is it possible that both sides have valid points?

None of this IS the reconciliation, but more of a precursor mindset.

161 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I’m not sure I’m understanding your question correctly, but if it is what I think it is there are some reconciliations for the contradiction.

Imagine if you will, a world where two parties disagree, both parties make the same claim, both parties are right in some ways, and missing the mark in others.

How does that reconcile? In this case, I believe it can.

In my opinion, both Jew and Gentile can be Israel, while both claimed Jew and claimed Christian can also NOT be Israel, because the dividing line is the actions taken and God’s judgment of the heart behind them.

“Jew” and “Israel” are also both highly overloaded words, which makes them both very difficult to communicate with - to intend a meaning, and to have that meaning be received.

Why do the rabbis declare Jesus an antimessiah? What are the arguments for “Jesus” (not his name) being the messiah? Which points are valid from either side? Did anyone miss something?

None of this IS the reconciliation, but more of a precursor mindset.

161 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I’m not sure I’m understanding your question correctly, but if it is what I think it is there are some reconciliations for the contradiction.

Imagine if you will, a world where two parties disagree, both parties make the same claim, both parties are right in some ways, and missing the mark in others.

How does that reconcile? In this case, I believe it can.

In my opinion, both Jew and Gentile can be Israel, while both claimed Jew and claimed Christian can also NOT be Israel, because the dividing line is the actions taken and God’s judgment of the heart behind them.

“Jew” and “Israel” are also both highly overloaded words, which makes them both very difficult to communicate with - to intend a meaning, and to have that meaning be received.

Why do the rabbis declare Jesus an antimessiah? What are the arguments for “Jesus” (not his name) being the messiah? Which points are valid from either side? Reconcile?

None of this IS the reconciliation, but more of a precursor mindset.

161 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I’m not sure I’m understanding your question correctly, but if it is what I think it is there are some reconciliations for the contradiction.

Imagine if you will, a world where two parties disagree, both parties make the same claim, both parties are right in some ways, and missing the mark in others.

How does that reconcile? In this case, I believe it can.

In my opinion, both Jew and Gentile can be Israel, while both claimed Jew and claimed Christian can also NOT be Israel, because the dividing line is the actions taken and God’s judgment of the heart behind them.

“Jew” and “Israel” are also both highly overloaded words, which makes them both very difficult to communicate with - to intend a meaning, and to have that meaning be received.

None of this IS the reconciliation, but more of a precursor mindset.

161 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I’m not sure I’m understanding your question correctly, but if it is what I think it is there are some reconciliations for the contradiction.

Imagine if you will, a world where two parties disagree, both parties make the same claim, both parties are right in some ways, and missing the mark in others.

How does that reconcile? In this case, I believe it can.

In my opinion, both Jew and Gentile can be Israel, while both claimed Jew and claimed Christian can also NOT be Israel, because the dividing line is the actions taken and God’s judgment of the heart behind them.

“Jew” and “Israel” are also both highly overloaded words, which makes them both very difficult to communicate with - to intend a meaning, and to have that meaning be received.

161 days ago
1 score