“Mr. Garland, would you say your definition of ‘interference’ more closely matches

• to look for and point out statistical discrepancies, observed violations of the law, or to point out places where the law has been changed to do funny things like empower noncitizens with authority over citizens Or
• to knowingly, unknowingly, or as part of an intentional operation to create those things?

If the definition of ‘interference’ is the former, which means you are endorsing the latter, then WHO DOES THAT MAKE YOU, and how exactly would someone who is protecting the active violation of the law not be a criminal himself?

“Mr. Garland, would you say your definition of ‘interference’ more closely matches

• to look for and point out statistical discrepancies, observed violations of the law, or to point out places where the law has been changed to do funny things like empower noncitizens with authority over citizens Or
• to knowingly, unknowingly, or as part of an intentional operation to create those things?

If the definition of ‘interference’ is the former, which means you are endorsing the latter, then WHO DOES THAT MAKE YOU, and how exactly would someone who is protecting the investigation of the active violation of the law not be a criminal himself?