ensure that individuals seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights are “law-abiding” persons.

Where in the 2nd amendment is that written?

Enter 18 USC241/242: A right protected by the Constitution ....

So, someone exercising this is, does so lawfully, as the Constitution protects it, and the government is prohibited from probing into it as a requirement to enjoy such a right.

Not to mention, certain people who pretend to be something they are not due to authorization, and conspiracy to deprive

added: Then the Historical analogue - test.

Nope. The 2nd does not warrant such a view, as it clearly says: this right SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

The historical analogue infringes ( en fringes, or puts a fringe around such a right) the free exercise of a right.

In effect, if you want to play with guns, you should be able to, and if you do not want to learn from the better handlers, than yeah, you may become liable for stupid use.

ensure that individuals seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights are “law-abiding” persons.

Where in the 2nd amendment is that written?

Enter 18 USC241/242: A right protected by the Constitution ....

So, someone exercising this is, does so lawfully, as the Constitution protects it, and the government is prohibited from probing into it as a requirement to enjoy such a right.

Not to mention, certain people who pretend to be something they are not due to authorization, and conspiracy to deprive