Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually useless rubbish not adding anything.
The point in using "excessive detail" is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing. You could do it,but explaining it as "detonation burning drops of the fuel made aerosol in engine chamber with piston(s) moved by the explosion being source of mechanical energy" is: better and more accurate. And yes you can make it like meme - just use more pictures instead of one. Or: animate it.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST. Really: NOT EXIST !!!
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: LEFT IS TOO STUPID TO EVEN SUMMARIZE AND GET TO THE MAIN IDEA.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually useless rubbish not adding anything.
The point in using "excessive detail" is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing. You could do it,but you shouldn't,explaining it as "detonation burning drops of the fuel made aerosol in engine chamber with piston(s) moved by the explosion being source of mechanical energy" is: better and more accurate. And yes you can make it like meme - just use more pictures instead of one. Or: animate it.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: LEFT IS TOO STUPID TO EVEN SUMMARIZE AND GET TO THE MAIN IDEA.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing. You could do it,but you shouldn't,explaining it as "detonation burning drops of the fuel made aerosol in engine chamber with piston(s) moved by the explosion being source of mechanical energy" is: better and more accurate. And yes you can make it like meme - just use more pictures instead of one. Or: animate it.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: LEFT IS TOO STUPID TO EVEN SUMMARIZE AND GET TO THE MAIN IDEA.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing. You could do it,but you shouldn't,explaining it as "detonation burning drops of the fuel made aerosol in engine chamber with piston(s) moved by the explosion being source of mechanical energy" is: better and more accurate.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: LEFT IS TOO STUPID TO EVEN SUMMARIZE AND GET TO THE MAIN IDEA.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing. You could do it,but you shouldn't,explaining it as "detonation burning drops of the fuel in engine chamber with piston moved by the explosion being source of mechanical energy" is: better.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: LEFT IS TOO STUPID TO EVEN SUMMARIZE AND GET TO THE MAIN IDEA.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing. You could do it,but you shouldn't.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: LEFT IS TOO STUPID TO EVEN SUMMARIZE AND GET TO THE MAIN IDEA.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" like the man is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: Left is too stupid to even summarize and get the main idea.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" like the man is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: Left is too stupid to even summarize and get main idea.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" like the man is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...
So THE POINT IS: Left in reality is too stupid to even summarize.
Well: not. Thing is left is NOT giving details. The left is only excessive. And their "details" are usually rubbish.
The point in using "excessive detail" like the man is you can reduce idea of engine to "fuel->mechanical energy" - but it would explain nothing.
The point of the left using it: NOT EXIST.
They are just unable to even make optimization.Are like kids never cleaning their room themselves...
Such simple thing autistic caring about the detail can learn, and even woman can learn is beyond their comprehension...