my initial thoughts were something along the lines of, "ok, maybe he is trying to roll with the punches, remaining defensive, stumbling slightly, so that it is clear that this is an unfair 3v1 setup, and that people will hopefully see through this, and (hopefully) realize kamabla is full of shit". But a few moments later I realized that was my copium speaking more than anything.
let's be real, there is nobody left to convince, there's nobody undecided, there's nobody still on the fence. at least no significant demographic anyway. what this WAS, on the other hand, this was THE opportunity to dismantle the harris campaign's hypocrisy and cancer in a "for the record" sense, so that it will remain written "in stone" that trump called her out face to face and warned the people of the impending dangers also "face to face" on live TV. but I don't think he achieved that. I don't recall him laying out a single "nailed it" phrase that could serve such a purpose, that could be quoted in posterity for its simple undeniable brutality.
after much thought and reading people's interpretations, no explanation can convince me that remaining subdued and defensive, going off on tangents on fringe topics, pointless repetition, and missing crucial opportunities at punching back, was a better alternative than being incisive, exact and eloquent as possible while dismantling the harris campaign in layman's terms for the common man
he got too tangled up in the bait they laid for him, instead of deflecting that shit with the sharp laconic wit that it deserves
my initial thoughts were something along the lines of, "ok, maybe he is trying to roll with the punches, remaining defensive, so that it is clear that this is an unfair 3v1 setup, and that people will hopefully see through this, and (hopefully) realize kamabla is full of shit". But a few moments later I realized that was my copium speaking more than anything.
let's be real, there is nobody left to convince, there's nobody undecided, there's nobody still on the fence. at least no significant demographic anyway. this was THE opportunity to dismantle the harris campaign's hypocrisy and cancer in a "for the record" sense, so that it will remain written "in stone" that trump called her out face to face and warned the people of the impending dangers also "face to face" on live TV.
after much thought and reading people's interpretations, no explanation can convince me that remaining subdued and defensive, going off on tangents on fringe topics, pointless repetition, and missing crucial opportunities at punching back, was a better alternative than being incisive, exact and eloquent as possible while dismantling the harris campaign in layman's terms for the common man
my initial thoughts were something along the lines of, "ok, maybe he is trying to roll with the punches, remaining defensive, so that it is clear that this is an unfair 3v1 setup, and people will see through this, and (hopefully) realize kamabla is not genuine". But a few moments later I realized that was my copium speaking more than anything.
let's be real, there is nobody left to convince, there's nobody undecided, there's nobody still on the fence. at least no significant demographic anyway.
after much thought and reading people's interpretations, no explanation can convince me that remaining subdued and defensive, going off on tangents on fringe topics, pointless repetition, and missing crucial opportunities at punching back was a better alternative than being incisive, exact and eloquent as possible while dismantling the harris campaign in layman's terms for the common man