IMHO, the selection of the most powerful and responsible person (the president) should not be done by the idiots, imbeciles and morons. Think of it as this way. In a company where the staff is hiring people not everyone gets the chance to sit in the interview panel. Because it takes certain ability to conduct interviews, assess people's skills being interviewed and judgemental skills. Just like how every migrant is required to take the citizenship test before getting qualified as a citizen, it might be a good idea for a registered voter to also take a test on the constitutional values, how the Congress works, basic knowledge of the election process, etc before being eligible to vote. A mandatory selection of a reason to choose a particular candidate as well as comments would be required when a voter chooses a candidate. An independent panel can process these selections and decide whether to accept the vote or reject.

Of course such measures can also backfire from the thinking angle of Democrats with brainwashed narrative about Trump (you know the whole "convicted felon", "nazi", "insurrectionist", etc.) and thought of anyone still choosing to vote for Trump being an idiot and not eligible to vote. Perhaps that's the reason for simple "anyone can vote" route that our founding fathers put forth.

IMHO, the selection of the most powerful and responsible person (the president) should not be done by the idiots, imbeciles and morons. Think of it as this way. In a company where the staff is hiring people not everyone gets the chance to sit in the interview panel. Because it takes certain ability to conduct interviews, assess people's skills being interviewed and judgemental skills. Just like how every migrant is required to take the citizenship test before getting qualified as a citizen, it might be a good idea for a registered voter to also take a test on the constitutional values, how the Congress works, basic knowledge of the election process, etc before being eligible to vote.