Will be ready. “We’re on the same team”. quote or paraphrase from Emily to Sylvie from “Emily in Paris” ____ Mark has the most solar symbolism if I understand correctly. Mark 14:13 and Luke 22:10 have the story where Yeshua or Yahoshua tells his disciples to enter the house of the man carrying the water pitcher —-> equivalent character in the heavens Aquarius.____ I would encourage you to approach the idea of a Creator God not as “love and obey me or else be damned” but as a Creator who fashioned and shaped the universe, visited in occasion (Abraham, Isaac, Joshua, some of the prophets and possibly as Yeshua / Yahoshua). ____ James and Paul volleyed in their letters against each other if the story line in Acts is correct, that Paul opposed the Pillars (James, Peter and John). 3 guys usually don’t write letters opposing each other’s ideas (Peter and James vs. Paul) over a fictional character. ____ If I wrote a book about the presidency of Peter Hammond: 1988 and how great his policies were, and then someone else wrote a book saying how terrible his policies as president were in 1988, and then someone else wrote a book about “Peter Hammond’s Presidency 1988: Mediocre” — we know that would be ludicrous (actor Peter Hammond was not President— shhh!!! don’t let others know! and shhhhh! don’t let others know that Zelensky is not president of Ukraine, his term expired!)____ What would your thoughts be about a historical character 2,000 years ago be, a character whose biographies were embellished after a couple of decades passed to fit the Hero story line, yet he still existed?

Will be ready. “We’re on the same team”. quote or paraphrase from Emily to Sylvie from “Emily in Paris” ____ Mark has the most solar symbolism if I understand correctly. Mark 14:13 and Luke 22:10 have the story where Yeshua or Yahoshua tells his disciples to enter the house of the man carrying the water pitcher —-> equivalent character in the heavens Aquarius.____ I would encourage you to approach the idea of a Creator God not as “love and obey me or else be damned” but as a Creator who fashioned and shaped the universe, visited in occasion (Abraham, Isaac, Joshua, some of the prophets and possibly as Yeshua / Yahoshua). ____ James and Paul volleyed in their letters against each other if the story line in Acts is correct, that Paul opposed the Pillars (James, Peter and John). 3 guys usually don’t write letters opposing each other’s ideas (Peter and James vs. Paul) over a fictional character. ____ If I wrote a book about the presidency of Peter Hammond: 1988 and how great his policies were, and then someone else wrote a book saying how terrible his policies as president were in 1988, and then someone else wrote a book about “Peter Hammond’s Presidency 1988: Mediocre” — we know that would be ludicrous (actor Peter Hammond was not President— shhh!!! don’t let others know! and shhhhh! don’t let others know that Zelensky is not president of Ukraine, his term expired!)____ What would your thoughts be about a historical character 2,000 years ago be whose biographies were embellished after a couple of decades passed to fit the Hero story line, yet he still existed?

Will be ready. “We’re on the same team”. quote or paraphrase from Emily to Sylvie from “Emily in Paris” ____ Mark has the most solar symbolism if I understand correctly. Mark 14:13 and Luke 22:10 have the story where Yeshua or Yahoshua tells his disciples to enter the house of the man carrying the water pitcher —-> equivalent character in the heavens Aquarius.____ I would encourage you to approach the idea of a Creator God not as “love and obey me or else be damned” but as a Creator who fashioned and shaped the universe, visited in occasion (Abraham, Isaac, Joshua, some of the prophets and possibly as Yeshua / Yahoshua). ____ James and Paul volleyed in their letters against each other if the story line in Acts is correct, that Paul opposed the Pillars (James, Peter and John). 3 guys usually don’t write letters opposing each other’s ideas (Peter and James vs. Paul) over a fictional character. ____ If I wrote a book about the presidency of Peter Hammond: 1988 and how great his policies were, and then someone else wrote a book saying how terrible his policies as president were in 1988, and then someone else wrote a book about “Peter Hammond’s Presidency 1988: Mediocre” — we know that would be ludicrous (actor Peter Hammond was not President— shhh!!! don’t let others know!).____ What would your thoughts be about a historical character 2,000 years ago be whose biographies were embellished after a couple of decades passed to fit the Hero story line, yet he still existed?