That's such a liberal nonsense! Correlation litreally always implies causation (your post from 11 hours ago)

Correlation does not imply causation (your post from 5 minutes ago)

So...which is it?

Edited to add:

Or are you saying that you think my point was that correlation does not imply causation?

If that is what you're saying, then you've missed my point.

I am pointing out the word imply is important here. It does not mean "prove". It means "to strongly suggest the truth or existence of something."

I'm pointing out that people who are in favor of childhood vaccinations are just as able to apply causation/correlation arguments as we can.

Implying something is not proving that it is a fact.

That's such a liberal nonsense! Correlation litreally always implies causation (your post from 11 hours ago)

Correlation does not imply causation (your post from 5 minutes ago)

So...which is it?

Edited to add:

Or are you saying that you think my point was that correlation does not imply causation?

If that is what you're saying, then you've missed my point.

I am pointing out the word imply is important here. It does not mean "prove". It means "to strongly suggest the truth or existence of something.

I'm pointing out that people who are in favor of childhood vaccinations are just as able to apply causation/correlation arguments as we can.

Implying something is not proving that it is a fact.

That's such a liberal nonsense! Correlation litreally always implies causation (your post from 11 hours ago)

Correlation does not imply causation (your post from 5 minutes ago)

So...which is it?

Edited to add:

Or are you saying that you think my point was that correlation does not imply causation?

If that is what you're saying, then you've missed my point.

I am pointing out the word imply is important here. It does not mean "prove". It means "to strongly suggest the truth or existence of something.

I'm pointing out that people who are in favor of childhood vaccinations are just as able to apply causation/correlation arguments as we can.

Implying something is not proving that it is a fact.

That's such a liberal nonsense! Correlation litreally always implies causation (your post from 11 hours ago)

Correlation does not imply causation (your post from 5 minutes ago)

So...which is it?