You explained diddlers gift.”

I explained how Combs accepted cabal funding, stole others’ artistic ideas, and manipulated younger people. If you want to play a semantic game you can say that his willingness to sell out was a dark gift, but really his desperation was because of his absence of giftedness.

Earlier you wrote,

the diddler was given an option to use his gifts for God and he chose it for evil.“

Accepting stolen money, ripping off others’ art, and manipulating people aren’t “gifts” that can serve God. They can only serve evil. If Combs ever had the option to serve God, it was with gifts that I haven’t described and that we may never know about because Combs never used them.

You explained diddlers gift.”

I explained how Combs accepted cabal funding, stole others’ artistic ideas, and manipulated younger people. If you want to play a semantic game you can say that his willingness to sell out was a dark gift, but really his desperation was because of his absence of giftedness.

Earlier you wrote, > the diddler was given an option to use his gifts for God and he chose it for evil.“

Accepting stolen money, ripping off others’ art, and manipulating people aren’t “gifts” that can serve God. They can only serve evil. If Combs ever had the option to serve God, it was with gifts that I haven’t described and that we may never know about because Combs never used them.