It was actually really difficult to create a title for this thread because of how dense the information here is. You're dealing with a family tree basically, and all the names, dates and so forth can very easily get overwhelming and criss-crossed in your brain when you are just listening.
What this really needs, as Melanie King suggested, is some kind of overview video to topically relate and explain each and every oddity, chronology issue and missing or existing record that's relevant here. If it were me I would get together a Glenn Beck style blackboard to write it all down and draw connecting lines to etc.
These lies go VERY DEEP, that much at least SHOULD BE APPARENT.
A word about records, both the existing ones that have been found by Candace and her sleuths in her listener base, as well as the records we DO NOT HAVE, most of which could help to exonerate the Harris family line and stand as a bulwark against using "unexplainable and very unlikely coincidence" as their affirmative explanation of WHY much of this appears as it does.
For her part Candace says she is NOT buying the conclusion that some records might not exist of have been lost with time BECAUSE this family had wealth and a functioning business. This was a wealthy parish where records for other families were well kept and preserved to this day, so the idea that records would, for example, have not been drawn up or contain incorrect information is far fetched.
The critical records we can't find have been removed intentionally, either destroyed, hidden, or, similar a question of employment at America's biggest fast food chain, simply NEVER EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Too many lies will tend to do that.
Of course if the other side were asked to produce any such documentation, I would wager about a 5% chance they would cough up a half decent forgery while the media lauded them for their actions, paying no mind to the Holiday Inn watermark on something that was once considered so precious in the time of our founders. Now a President's resignation letter, to be shown again in history books and D.C. History museum exhibits for all time, a true piece of American history without hyperbole or cliche...
Yes, THAT is okay to write on a fkin post it note according to them. The end is nigh. 😪
I digress. The 95% option would be to gas up the old media mobile, Operation BIRTHER 2.0 is putting away in the driveway, ready to run again. Its racist to ask for, say, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE for the man calling himself Dennis J. Harris, even with the circumstances we just outlined.
Hell, it would probably be too "racist" to even ATTEMPT TO ASK QUESTIONS as to what went on here. I mean there ACTUALLY ARE some reasonable answers that could explain things. As Candace repeatedly mentions, perhaps there was another BERYL who gave birth to another DONALD, in the same year of 1938, in the same parish.... well, I didn't say it would sound very likely, just that it was technically possible.
The story so far....
So it appears there is much confusion and much missing from our knowledge thus far.Taken from Kamala's book, a photo from 1995 featuring someone she claims is her Grandmother. The only such picture of it's kind with Kamala and this woman supposedly named Beryl.
Then we have birth records, 1914, with a name "Beril". I believe Kamala in the book explains this, her mother Iris told her the reasons for the spelling change, cant recall exactly but fairly common and harmless I think.
We have Beryl giving birth to Donald Harris 1938, who in his own writings concerned with his family corroborates that year as when he was born.
But then as mentioned, a death certificate in 1940 for a Donald Harris aged under 2 years old. The person recorded as the father is NOT a match to the name he gives as his father and Kamala's grandfather, so, more confusion.
Then one more birth for Beryl Harris much later, a daughter this time I believe? Then a death certificate in 1960 where a hysterectomy or the like is noted for Beryl, indication possibly of childbirth issues she experienced. Further connecting her as the 1914 Beryl.
Only problem there is that this Beryl died six years BEFORE Kamala was born!
Some record of her or another female family member's name being listed as a servant girl? Kamala's mother or grandmother? Which was certainly NOT mentioned previously if the connection is accurate.
Several other males seem to glide into the story as well, some with Harris last name and others possibly a step father to Donald Harris. These names seem to be only on a record from the past, or they were mentioned in writing by Donald or Kamala but DO NOT APPEAR in any records - one or the other but never both.
Candace has FOUR (4!!) episodes driving into this so far and has made some INCREDIBLE discoveries. I truly hope the media will pick it up soon and give it the October surprise treatment, this could DEVESTATE Kamala's campaign and ensure Trump's success no matter how big they rig it.
Sorry for the delay all links up now:
It was actually really difficult to create a title for this thread because of how dense the information here is. You're dealing with a family tree basically, and all the names, dates and so forth can very easily get overwhelming and criss-crossed in your brain when you are just listening.
What this really needs, as Melanie King suggested, is some kind of overview video to topically relate and explain each and every oddity, chronology issue and missing or existing record that's relevant here. If it were me I would get together a Glenn Beck style blackboard to write it all down and draw connecting lines to etc.
These lies go VERY DEEP, that much at least SHOULD BE APPARENT.
A word about records, both the existing ones that have been found by Candace and her sleuths in her listener base, as well as the records we DO NOT HAVE, most of which could help to exonerate the Harris family line and stand as a bulwark against using "unexplainable and very unlikely coincidence" as their affirmative explanation of WHY much of this appears as it does.
For her part Candace says she is NOT buying the conclusion that some records might not exist of have been lost with time BECAUSE this family had wealth and a functioning business. This was a wealthy parish where records for other families were well kept and preserved to this day, so the idea that records would, for example, have not been drawn up or contain incorrect information is far fetched.
The critical records we can't find have been removed intentionally, either destroyed, hidden, or, similar a question of employment at America's biggest fast food chain, simply NEVER EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Too many lies will tend to do that.
Of course if the other side were asked to produce any such documentation, I would wager about a 5% chance they would cough up a half decent forgery while the media lauded them for their actions, paying no mind to the Holiday Inn watermark on something that was once considered so precious in the time of our founders. Now a President's resignation letter, to be shown again in history books and D.C. History museum exhibits for all time, a true piece of American history without hyperbole or cliche...
Yes, THAT is okay to write on a fkin post it note according to them. The end is nigh. 😪
I digress. The 95% option would be to gas up the old media mobile, Operation BIRTHER 2.0 is putting away in the driveway, ready to run again. Its racist to ask for, say, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE for the man calling himself Dennis J. Harris, even with the circumstances we just outlined.
Hell, it would probably be too "racist" to even ATTEMPT TO ASK QUESTIONS as to what went on here. I mean there ACTUALLY ARE some reasonable answers that could explain things. As Candace repeatedly mentions, perhaps there was another BERYL who gave birth to another DONALD, in the same year of 1938, in the same parish.... well, I didn't say it would sound very likely, just that it was technically
To be continued.....
Candace 1st show link
Candace 2nd show
Melanie King 2nd vid
Melanie main acount video
Links will be here shortly!