Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The lie is what Peters was sentenced for.

This is not an honest description of what she was accused of and what she was found guilty of

The evidence shows she did do what she was accused, planning and executing a breach of election equipment.

It would be one thing if she said she did it as an act of civil disobedience, but she didn't.

When a copy of the election machine system and passwords from her county showed up on the internet Gerald Wood was suspected of the breach because his access card was used to get into the room with the machines.

Who is Wood? An outside IT consultant hired by Tina Peter's. He doesn't work for the state of Colorado like other election workers. She got him an access card. But he never actually was asked to do any work and Peters took his card back. Wood also seen elsewhere at the time of the breach

Perhaps they could just review the security cameras to see who was in the room at the time. Well, Tina Peter's actually asked them to be turned off.

So she set this guy up and stole this guy's identity brought an unauthorized user into the room who copied the election system data put it up on the internet.

This is why she was convicted.

At her sentencing Wood said

“When I was approached … about helping them preserve records, I operated in good faith,” he said. “But in return, they — in league with others — lied to me, stole my identity and committed crimes in my name.”

He also said he had to try to explain to his church congregation why he was innocent of the crimes he was being accused of. He said this was humiliating and she never apologized to him

13 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The lie is what Peters was sentenced for.

This is not an honest description of what she was accused of and what she was found guilty of

The evidence shows she did do what she was accused, planning and executing a breach of election equipment.

It would be one thing if she said she did it as an act of civil disobedience, but she didn't.

When a copy of the election machine system and passwords from her county showed up on the internet Gerald Wood was suspected of the breach because his access card was used to get into the room with the machines.

Who is Wood? An IT consultant hired by Tina Wood. He doesn't work for the state of Colorado like other election workers. She got him an access card. But he never actually was asked to do any work and Peters took his card back. Wood also seen elsewhere at the time of the breach

Perhaps they could just review the security cameras to see who was in the room at the time. Well, Tina Peter's actually asked them to be turned off.

So she stole this guy's identity brought an unauthorized user into the room who copied the election system data put it up on the internet.

This is why she was convicted.

At her sentencing Wood said

“When I was approached … about helping them preserve records, I operated in good faith,” he said. “But in return, they — in league with others — lied to me, stole my identity and committed crimes in my name.”

13 days ago
1 score