Why was Yearick's white van there with it's Arizona plates? Why is he missing?

If there's actual solid evidence that Yearick had a white van registered in Arizona, I would like to see it.

Why didn't the secret service have someone effectively watching that roof?

This has been discussed like a thousand times. This building was outside the secure perimeter. The Secret Service was active inside the secure perimeter. Security at this building was given to local cops. To me, it seems this is a screw of both the local cops and the Secret Service.

The local cops took up positions with in the building giving them limited sight and the Secret Service did not check this as part of their plan. It seems the Secret Service made an assumption this would be covered correctly.

Given that Yearick was a guy with combat experience in Ukraine, doesn't that make him fit the profile for a sniper?

We haven't even established Yearick was in Butler, Pennsylvania. I haven't heard any of this stuff about him being a guy from Ukraine or sniper trained.

Where would Crooks get the components for the devices found in his car?

Kid was an engineering student. It's actually not too hard to get these things if you know what you're doing. My understanding was the remote receivers were pretty simple devices similar to a garage door opener

Did you know that Yearick's family make explosives for the CIA in their factory in Arizona?

I don't know this because I think none of this is true.

Different Yearick The Armory didn't make explosives. Thus, they couldn't be making explosives for the CIA because they didn't make explosives.

You prefer to think that the shooter was a 20 year old greenhorn acting on his own?

I think this part's really interesting. This gets to the difference between how you and I approach this. It's not about what I prefer to think. My approach is they found this 20-year-old dead kid on the roof. And people watched him get on the roof and they watched him shoot his gun and they watched him die. So yeah I'm pretty sure that kid was the shooter.. .. but it doesn't start with me. Wanting to think that way it starts with the facts and then going from there. Also I've never actually understood where the info on Yearick came from to begin with.

So we don't agree on the basic facts of this event. And no, I don't leap to the conclusion that you leap to.

My understanding was Yearick is some antifa type And I don't think of those guys as having a military background.

But what's the single best piece of evidence that places Yearick in Butler, PA on the day of the shooting. I think the evidence for Crooks has been consistent. And in fact, there's more video or body cam footage or other stuff has come out. It has remained consistent. For example, he was found dead on the roof in a position right in line to take the shots and the trajectories that were fired.

Why was Yearick's white van there with it's Arizona plates? Why is he missing?

If there's actual solid evidence that Yearick had a white van registered in Arizona, I would like to see it.

Why didn't the secret service have someone effectively watching that roof?

This has been discussed like a thousand times. This building was outside the secure perimeter. The Secret Service was active inside the secure perimeter. Security at this building was given to local cops. To me, it seems this is a screw of both the local cops and the Secret Service.

The local cops took up positions with in the building giving them limited sight and the Secret Service did not check this as part of their plan. It seems the Secret Service made an assumption this would be covered correctly.

Given that Yearick was a guy with combat experience in Ukraine, doesn't that make him fit the profile for a sniper?

We haven't even established uric was in Butler, Pennsylvania. I haven't heard any of this stuff about him being a guy from Ukraine or sniper trained.

You prefer to think that the shooter was a 20 year old greenhorn acting on his own?

I think this part's really interesting. This gets to the difference between how you and I approach this. It's not about what I prefer to think. My approach is they found this 20-year-old dead kid on the roof. And people watched him get on the roof and they watched him shoot and they watched him die. So yeah I'm pretty sure that kid was the shooter.. .. but it doesn't start with me. Wanting to think that way it starts with the facts and then going from there. Also I've never actually understood where the info on Yearick came from to begin with.

So we don't agree on the basic facts of this event. And no, I don't leap to the conclusion that you leap to.

My understanding was Yearick is some antifa type And I don't think of those guys as having a military background.

But what's the single best piece of evidence that places Yearick in Butler, PA on the day of the shooting. I think the evidence for Crooks has been consistent. And in fact, there's more video or body cam footage or other stuff has come out. It has remained consistent. For example, he was found dead on the roof in a position right in line to take the shots and the trajectories that were fired.