Just as movies like the Bourne Identity and the Manchurian Candidate reveal clandestine methods used by the CIA, the 1975 film Three Days of the Condor reveals how intelligence communications are encoded in fiction novels. These SIGINT methods align with those revealed by Q in modern MSM and social media posts.
The below minute marks in the movie make the case that comms being embedded in mass media isn't just "Q Anon" conspiracy theory. It's an intelligence practice that was taken seriously enough in 1975 to be the basis for a spy thriller cast with major Hollywood stars like Robert Redford and Faye Dunaway.
The film is free here: https://tinyurl.com/bdde2td8
(I recommend the high quality version on Prime.)
Minute# 8:05: Robert Redford's character, a CIA researcher, is highlighting capitalized words and numbers in a fiction book that stand out as coded language. This is consistent with decodes in Q and Twitter posts.
Minute# 5:20: There are two points being made in this scene. The first is that symbols and their meaning are of significant import in intelligence comms. He draws a Chinese ideogram for his co-worker to interpret, but they have a friendly disagreement because her suggestions are not consistent with whatever possible message Redford is trying to decode. The second point is how books are used as carriers of intelligence communications. Redford explains how he's suspicious of this mystery novel because it was not profitable yet it was translated into an "Odd assortment of languages." This emphasizes how the book is obviously intended to convey coded communications to intelligence agencies of certain nationalities.
Minute# 42:00: In this scene, the protagonist explains his job: "I just read books. We read everything that's published in the world. And we feed the plots, dirty tricks, codes, into a computer. And the computer checks against actual CIA plans and operations. I look for leaks, for new ideas. We read adventures and novels and journals."
It's worth noting the overarching theme of the movie about our intelligence community being rogue, amoral, and operating independently of oversight under the guise of "national security."
Just as movies like the Bourne Identity and the Manchurian Candidate reveal clandestine methods used by the CIA, the 1975 film Three Days of the Condor reveals how intelligence communications are encoded in mass media. These SIGINT methods align with those revealed by Q in modern MSM and social media posts.
The below minute marks in the movie make the case that comms being embedded in mass media isn't just "Q Anon" conspiracy theory. It's an intelligence practice that was taken seriously enough in 1975 to be the basis for a spy thriller cast with major Hollywood stars like Robert Redford and Faye Dunaway.
The film is free here: https://tinyurl.com/bdde2td8
(I recommend the high quality version on Prime.)
Minute# 8:05: Robert Redford's character, a CIA researcher, is highlighting capitalized words and numbers in a fiction book that stand out as coded language. This is consistent with decodes in Q and Twitter posts.
Minute# 5:20: There are two points being made in this scene. The first is that symbols and their meaning are of significant import in intelligence comms. He draws a Chinese ideogram for his co-worker to interpret, but they have a friendly disagreement because her suggestions are not consistent with whatever possible message Redford is trying to decode. The second point is how books are used as carriers of intelligence communications. Redford explains how he's suspicious of this mystery novel because it was not profitable yet it was translated into an "Odd assortment of languages." This emphasizes how the book is obviously intended to convey coded communications to intelligence agencies of certain nationalities.
Minute# 42:00: In this scene, the protagonist explains his job: "I just read books. We read everything that's published in the world. And we feed the plots, dirty tricks, codes, into a computer. And the computer checks against actual CIA plans and operations. I look for leaks, for new ideas. We read adventures and novels and journals."
It's worth noting the overarching theme of the movie about our intelligence community being rogue, amoral, and operating independently of oversight under the guise of "national security."