I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) but note that I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it available.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research and reasoning, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) but note that I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it available.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it in the video.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it in the video.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.