Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

If I may, let me explain the problem at it's core. It is the design.

The healthcare industry can only thrive if we are sick. It goes bankrupt if we are all well. The incentives are backwards. It should be they are paid when we are all well and go broke if we are all sick. We would pay for the health instead of the sickness. Insane design for a system.

To make things worse... this backwards set up is then paid for by insurance companies that can only thrive if they don't pay. It is the only way for them. If the system was only paid when we are healthy... the insurance model change too. They are then responsible for a extremely small population of sick people. A mere $5 dollars a month from 350 million people should do the trick.

There are some serious paradigm shifts ahead for us.

37 days ago
3 score
Reason: Original

If I may, let me explain the problem at it's core. It is the design.

The healthcare industry can only thrive if we are sick. It goes bankrupt if we are all well. The incentives are backwards. It should be they are paid when we are all well and go broke if we are all sick. We would pay for the health instead of the sickness. Insane design for a system.

To make things worse... this backwards set up is then paid for by insurance companies that can only thrive if they don't pay. It is the only way for them. If the system was only paid when we are healthy... the insurance model change too. They are then responsible for a extremely small population of sick people. A mere $5 dollars a month from 350 million people should do the trick.

There is some serious paradigm shifts ahead for us.

37 days ago
1 score