This is trying to prompt self reflection, which doesn’t seem to be one of their strong suites.
It’s not accusing them of BEING evil, but assuming… on the off chance… that they were…
“WELL, FOR STARTERS, I WOULD DENY WOMEN HEALTH CARE”
No, no, let’s go more fundamental than that. Don’t think about what policies you would or wouldn’t endorse, but by what measuring stick are we valuating what we we think?
“WOMEN’S RIGHTS TO THEIR OWN BODIES!”
Yes ok, but what principle is it that makes that important? Keep the discussion away from anything that’s had propaganda programming applied to it.
This is trying to prompt self reflection, which doesn’t seem to be one of their strong suites.
It’s not accusing them of BEING evil, but assuming… on the off chance… that they were…
“WELL, FOR STARTERS, I WOULD DENY WOMEN HEALTH CARE”
No, no, let’s go more fundamental than that. Don’t think about what policies you would or wouldn’t endorse, but by what measuring stick are we valuating what we we think?
“WOMEN’S RIGHTS TO THEIR OWN BODIES!”
Yes ok, but what principle is it that makes that important?
This is trying to prompt self reflection, which doesn’t seem to be one of their strong suites.
It’s not accusing them of BEING evil, but assuming… on the off chance… that they were…
“WELL, FOR STARTERS, I WOULD DENY WOMEN HEALTH CARE”
No, no, let’s go more fundamental than that. Don’t think about what policies you would or wouldn’t endorse, but by what measuring stick are we valuating what we we think?
“WOMEN’S RIGHTS TO THEIR OWN BODIES!”
Yes ok, but what principle is it that makes that important?
This is trying to prompt self reflection, which doesn’t seem to be one of their strong suites.
It’s not accusing them of BEING evil, but assuming… on the off chance… that they were…
“WELL, FOR STARTERS, I WOULD DENY WOMEN HEALTH CARE”
No, no, let’s go more fundamental than that. Don’t think about what policies you would or wouldn’t endorse, but by what measuring stick are we valuating what we we think?