OP is obsessed with "ooh, this reporter is fake, that reporter is not fake"

Made sense about 7 or 8 years ago, but surely we (you?) are far beyond that now? Q indicated a few very interesting journos, but beyond that, surely we ALL know that the MSM including Faux is not what they appear on the surface.

Baier doesn't need to be a 'white hat' or anything like that for this interview to have an impact. Do you think Harris's controllers would agree to her doing an interview with Tucker or something?????

This interview was not for you, or autists, or Q folks. It was for the normie rank and file. 100% appropriate to have an MSM journo (if that's your definition of a fake journo) do this.

Focusing on the interviewer journalist instead of the impact of the interview is like driving from NY to LA and being obsessed about oh, loook, I got some wear on my tires.

Or like saying "hey, everyone! Did you know that the Vatican is corrupt????" This is GAW, not Facebook.

Think big picture. Who Baier is is such a minute (tiny) issue I don't see either why this post was made, or even stickied.

<end rant>

OP is obsessed with "ooh, this reporter is fake, that reporter is not fake"

Made sense about 7 or 8 years ago, but surely we (you?) are far beyond that now? Q indicated a few very interesting journos, but beyond that, surely we ALL know that the MSM including Faux is not what they appear on the surface.

Baier doesn't need to be a 'white hat' or anything like that for this interview to have an impact. Do you think Harris's controllers would agree to her doing an interview with Tucker or something?????

Focusing on the interviewer journalist instead of the impact of the interview is like driving from NY to LA and being obsessed about oh, loook, I got some wear on my tires.

Or like saying "hey, everyone! Did you know that the Vatican is corrupt????" This is GAW, not Facebook.

Think big picture. Who Baier is is such a minute (tiny) issue I don't see either why this post was made, or even stickied.

<end rant>