There are some major problems with this story and the way it's being presented.

Condemning a building is not the same as property confiscation or forced buyout. Local governments have the authority to enforce building codes and declare a building unlivable in its current condition.

From the debris piles and mud on the walls it's clear the whole area was under 4-5 feet of water. That house is probably full of mud and will need to be gutted to prevent deadly mold infestation. Local government had the responsibility to condemn it. This x account suggests MSHA was involved but the witness does not mention that, nor does she say the land was taken.

The trailers are mobile homes, likely rented out by the person in the brick house. They also need be gutted after being underwater. According the witness several of them were not condemned because they had little water damage. Those tenants were allowed to stay, which is further confirmation that the land was not taken.

Important to note that whoever condemned these buildings relied on local firefighters to enforce it. This x accounts wants us to think FEMA thugs wearing mining hats were physically throwing people off the property. My question is, who actually condemned the buildings? NC governor is a DS stooge so it wouldn't surprise me if local authorities were going along with whatever FEMA suggested.

There are some major problems with this story and the way it's being presented.

Condemning a building is not the same as property confiscation or forced buyout. Local governments have the authority to enforce building codes and declare a building unlivable in its current condition.

From the debris piles and mud on the walls it's clear the whole area was under 4-5 feet of water. That house is probably full of mud and will need to be gutted to prevent deadly mold infestation. Local government had the responsibility to condemn it. This x account suggests MSHA was involved but the witness does not mention that, nor does he say the land was taken.

The trailers are mobile homes, likely rented out by the person in the brick house. They also need be gutted after being underwater. According the witness several of them were not condemned because they had little water damage. Those tenants were allowed to stay, which is further confirmation that the land was not taken.

Important to note that whoever condemned these buildings relied on local firefighters to enforce it. This x accounts wants us to think FEMA thugs wearing mining hats were physically throwing people off the property. My question is, who actually condemned the buildings? NC governor is a DS stooge so it wouldn't surprise me if local authorities were going along with whatever FEMA suggested.