The Nazis had zero interest in "white European heritage." They disrespected any white ethnicity other than Aryan.

Show me which White people they disrespected.

The undivided/indivisible thing in the Pledge of Allegiance is not about anchor babies; it's about preventing States from leaving the Union.

You could maybe argue that about "indivisible," but not about "undivided."

They took out "undivided" for a reason -- they WANTED to allow divided allegiance (which is an oxymoron).

Your analysis of Hitler is simplistic.

Says you, who believes the mainstream garbage -- the most simplistic view of all ("Hitler ... evil ... let's end the discussion, and not analyze anything").

Hitler arose as a product of WWI and the terms imposed by the Allies (primarily pushed by Wilson) ...

True, except that Wilson was a puppet of jews.

... the idea that WWII was about "the Jews" is also imposed in retrospect. No one really paid all that much attention to them at the time.

LOL, Hitler talked about the jews in his speeches ALL THE TIME.

From the anti-Germany side, it was about England wanting to keep Germany from getting stronger, as they had become the #1 economy in the world under Hitler. But it was also about the jews wanting to destroy the Germans, and especially Hitler, in part as a response to Hitler kicking them out of Germany, and in part due to their desire to spread their communism to Europe, and then the rest of the world.

Hyperinflation, unemployment, ...

Yes, all of that is well-docmented as historical fact. What is also well-known -- and even more well-known by the German people at the time -- were Hitler's views, as he wrote a book about his views, for all the German folk to read.

Everybody knew who he was and what his mission was -- AND THEY SUPPORTED IT.

THIS is what you and most people refuse to see. It is hidden from the "official" history books because once you realize that the German people knew Hitler's agenda, there was NOTHING secretive about it, you would then have to ask: WHY did they support him?

And THAT is what the jewish media does not want people to know.

WHY were the jews a problem?

Even modern day rabbis don't know, and when they find out, here is what they say:

"Why did Hitler hate the jews?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4

And another rabbi:

"Hitler's first two laws"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lP2P4aeIuzEx/

Modern "historians" (so-called) absolutely MUST lie about this part of history in order to push their narratives.

The Nazi philosophy was anti-non-Germans

False. They were pro-nationalism. By that, they meant their OWN PEOPLE, as a NATION.

The word "nation" today has become bastardized, like so many other words. Gay used to mean happy.

Nation comes from the latin "nacio," which means "of birth." It is a community of poeple who are OF THE SAME BIRTH, or OF THE SAME GENETIC FAMILY TREE.

The "socialism" they promoted was NOT leftist Marxism, which you erroneously stated in another thread.

Rather, it was similar to the American Founding Fathers in the preamble to the Consitution, which reads:

" ... [to] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

By this, they did not mean to create a "welfare state," but to promote the general well-being. Similarly, the German national "socialism" was to help their fellow brothers and sisters -- the Germanic people and their general well-being -- which was nothing at all to do with communist ideology (which is what they were fighting against by fighting the jews, who created and promoted communism).

Also, German "national" socialism was similar to the American's "... ourselves and our Posterity." IOW -- "OUR PEOPLE."

Jews were not the main focus, they were simply caught up in the whole "racial hygiene" thing.

That is complete bullshit and an attempt to change history -- just like all the fake history books out there -- which you gobbled up and never questioned.

There was a whole lot more going on than your simplisitic "it was the Jews" analysis.

Since you CLEARLY do not understand what THEY meant by "national" or "socialist," and instead use your own terms (such as "gay" meaning homosexual, when the original meaning was happy) ... I would say YOU are the one with a simplistic view.

And since YOU have no clue what happened in history, you ARE (right now) being condemned to repeat it, as Santayana said, as we are witnessing (right now) the destruction of America by the same people using the same means that the German people were under attack from in the 1920's and 1930's.

Put down the mainstream propaganda, do some additional research, and ... Get a clue.

The Nazis had zero interest in "white European heritage." They disrespected any white ethnicity other than Aryan.

Show me which White people they disrespected.

The undivided/indivisible thing in the Pledge of Allegiance is not about anchor babies; it's about preventing States from leaving the Union.

You could maybe argue that about "indivisible," but not about "undivided."

They took out "undivided" for a reason -- they WANTED to allow divided allegiance (which is an oxymoron).

Your analysis of Hitler is simplistic.

Says you, who believes the mainstream garbage -- the most simplistic view of all ("Hitler ... evil ... let's end the discussion, and not analyze anything").

Hitler arose as a product of WWI and the terms imposed by the Allies (primarily pushed by Wilson) ...

True, except that Wilson was a puppet of jews.

... the idea that WWII was about "the Jews" is also imposed in retrospect. No one really paid all that much attention to them at the time.

LOL, Hitler talked about the jews in his speeches ALL THE TIME.

From the anti-Germany side, it was about England wanting to keep Germany from getting stronger, as they had become the #1 economy in the world under Hitler. But it was also about the jews wanting to destroy the Germans, and especially Hitler, in part as a response to Hitler kicking them out of Germany, and in part due to their desire to spread their communism to Europe, and then the rest of the world.

Hyperinflation, unemployment, ...

Yes, all of that is well-docmented as historical fact. What is also well-known -- and even more well-known by the German people at the time -- were Hitler's views, as he wrote a book about his views, for all the German folk to read.

Everybody knew who he was and what his mission was -- AND THEY SUPPORTED IT.

THIS is what you and most people refuse to see. It is hidden from the "official" history books because once you realize that the German people knew Hitler's agenda, there was NOTHING secretive about it, you would then have to ask: WHY did they support him?

And THAT is what the jewish media does not want people to know.

WHY were the jews a problem?

Even modern day rabbis don't know, and when they find out, here is what they say:

"Why did Hitler hate the jews?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4

And another rabbi:

"Hitler's first two laws"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lP2P4aeIuzEx/

Modern "historians" (so-called) absolutely MUST lie about this part of history in order to push their narratives.

The Nazi philosophy was anti-non-Germans

False. They were pro-nationalism. By that, they meant their OWN PEOPLE, as a NATION.

The word "nation" today has become bastardized, like so many other words. Gay used to mean happy.

Nation comes from the latin "nacio," which means "of birth." It is a community of poeple who are OF THE SAME BIRTH, or OF THE SAME GENETIC FAMILY TREE.

The "socialism" they promoted was NOT leftist Marxism, which you erroneously stated in another thread.

Rather, it was similar to the American Founding Fathers in the preamble to the Consitution, which reads:

" ... [to] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

By this, they did not mean to create a "welfare state," but to promote the general well-being. Similarly, the German national "socialism" was to help their fellow brothers and sisters -- the Germanic people and their general well-being -- which was nothing at all to do with communist ideology (which is what they were fighting against by fighting the jews, who created and promoted communism).

Also, German "national" socialism was similar to the American's "... ourselves and our Posterity." IOW -- "OUR PEOPLE."

Jews were not the main focus, they were simply caught up in the whole "racial hygiene" thing.

That is complete bullshit and an attempt to change history -- just like all the fake history books out there -- which you gobbled up and never questioned.

There was a whole lot more going on than your simplisitic "it was the Jews" analysis.

Since you CLEARLY do not understand what THEY meant by "national" or "socialist," and instead use your own terms (such as "gay" meaning homosexual, when the original meaning was happy) ... I would say YOU are the one with a simplistic view.

And since YOU have no clue what happened in history, you ARE (right now) being condemned to repeat it, as Santayana said, as we are witnessing (right now) the destruction of America by the same people using the same means that the German people were under attack from in the 1920's and 1930's.

Put down the mainstream propaganda, do some additional research, and ... Get a clue.

The Nazis had zero interest in "white European heritage." They disrespected any white ethnicity other than Aryan.

Show me which White people they disrespected.

The undivided/indivisible thing in the Pledge of Allegiance is not about anchor babies; it's about preventing States from leaving the Union.

You could maybe argue that about "indivisible," but not about "undivided."

They took out "undivided" for a reason -- they WANTED to allow divided allegiance (which is an oxymoron).

Your analysis of Hitler is simplistic.

Says you, who believes the mainstream garbage -- the most simplistic view of all ("Hitler ... evil ... let's end the discussion, and not analyze anything").

Hitler arose as a product of WWI and the terms imposed by the Allies (primarily pushed by Wilson) ...

True, except that Wilson was a puppet of jews.

... the idea that WWII was about "the Jews" is also imposed in retrospect. No one really paid all that much attention to them at the time.

LOL, Hitler talked about the jews in his speeches ALL THE TIME.

From the anti-Germany side, it was about England wanting to keep Germany from getting stronger, as they had become the #1 economy in the world under Hitler. But it was also about the jews wanting to destroy the Germans, and especially Hitler, in part as a response to Hitler kicking them out of Germany, and in part due to their desire to spread their communism to Europe, and then the rest of the world.

Hyperinflation, unemployment, ...

Yes, all of that is well-docmented as historical fact. What is also well-known -- and even more well-known by the German people at the time -- were Hitler's views, as he wrote a book about his views, for all the German folk to read.

Everybody knew who he was and what his mission was -- AND THEY SUPPORTED IT.

THIS is what you and most people refuse to see. It is hidden from the "official" history books because once you realize that the German people knew Hitler's agenda, there was NOTHING secretive about it, you would then have to ask: WHY did they support him?

And THAT is what the jewish media does not want people to know.

WHY were the jews a problem?

Even modern day rabbis don't know, and when they find out, here is what they say:

"Why did Hitler hate the jews?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4

And another rabbi:

"Hitler's first two laws"

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lP2P4aeIuzEx/

Modern "historians" (so-called") absolutely MUST lie about this part of history in order to push their narratives.

The Nazi philosophy was anti-non-Germans

False. They were pro-nationalism. By that, they meant their OWN PEOPLE, as a NATION.

The word "nation" today has become bastardized, like so many other words. Gay used to mean happy.

Nation comes from the latin "nacio," which means "of birth." It is a community of poeple who are OF THE SAME BIRTH, or OF THE SAME GENETIC FAMILY TREE.

The "socialism" they promoted was NOT leftist Marxism, which you erroneously stated in another thread.

Rather, it was similar to the American Founding Fathers in the preamble to the Consitution, which reads:

... [to] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

By this, they did not mean to create a "welfare state," but to promote the general well-being. Similarly, the German national "socialism" was to help their fellow brothers and sisters -- the Germanic people and their general well-being -- which was nothing at all to do with communist ideology (which is what they were fighting against by fighting the jews, who created and promoted communism).

Also, German "national" socialism was similar to the American's "... ourselves and our Posterity." IOW -- "OUR PEOPLE."

Jews were not the main focus, they were simply caught up in the whole "racial hygiene" thing.

That is complete bullshit and an attempt to change history -- just like all the fake history books out there -- which you gobbled up and never questioned.

There was a whole lot more going on than your simplisitic "it was the Jews" analysis.

Since you CLEARLY do not understand what THEY meant by "national" or "socialist," and instead use your own terms (such as "gay" meaning homosexual, when the original meaning was happy) ... I would say YOU are the one with a simplistic view.

And since YOU have no clue what happened in history, you ARE (right now) being condemned to repeat it, as Santayana said, as we are witnessing (right now) the destruction of America by the same people using the same means that the German people were under attack from in the 1920's and 1930's.

Put down the mainstream propaganda, do some additional research, and ... Get a clue.