Here in lies the double edged sword of the peoples right to contract. Originally, Americans understood what the founders had given them, namely the sovereign rights of kings. What was the sovereign right of a king? To create law. The founders literally gave us the sovereignty of kings. What this meant was we the people had the ability to create our own law for our own houses in our own courts of record. Here was the difference though... everyone had this ability and when your sovereign law encroached on mine, we needed to settle our disputes with a jury of our peers. Quick fact: original common law grand juries were 25 from the peerage and not 24... Why do you think?

All of this to say, we the people have the right to contract with anyone else no matter how one sided or even immoral it may seem to you. I respectfully disagree with the root being usury and think it to be more related to the fact that the corporate government has been administering our estates (all we own in law, including our bodies) by calling us persons (or infants) and not people. An infant cannot hold title until they have come of age and claimed their estate.

The roots are, in my opinion, the unlawful "acts" enacted by the government from its inception against the people. Two major ones being the 14th and the 16th amendments. I do agree that money as debt is a major one as well.

Here in lies the double edged sword of the peoples right to contract. Originally, Americans understood what the founders had given them, namely the sovereign rights of kings. What was the sovereign right of a king? To create law. The founders literally gave us the sovereignty of kings. What this meant was we the people had the ability to create our own law for our own houses in our own courts of record. Here was the difference though... everyone had this ability and when your sovereign law encroached on mine, we needed to settle our disputes with a jury of our peers. Quick fact: original common law grand juries were 25 from the peerage and not 24... Why do you think?

All of this to say, we the people have the right to contract with anyone else no matter how one sided or even immoral it may seem to you. I respectfully disagree with the root being usury and think it to be more related to the fact that the corporate government has been administering our estates (all we own in law, including our bodies) by calling us persons (or infants) and not people. An infant cannot hold title until they have come of age and claimed their estate.

The roots are, in my opinion, the unlawful "acts" enacted by the government from its inception against the people. Two major ones being the 14th and the 16th amendments. I do aggrege that money as debt is a major one as well.