“Nominating someone who has a track record of pushing conspiracy theories … is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.

If people like this are saying similar things - is this a Q proof? It sounds like.

Let’s think logically:

The new DNI (with a track record of “conspiracy theories”) starts the job. What are the possible scenarios?

• The DNI gains the access to the best information in class and finds out that the “conspiracy theories” were just false … curing the brain from ever believing these type of theories again.

• The DNI gains the access and finds out that all these theories were true!

“… is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.

Let’s look at our scenarios:

• Is the first one dangerous? Nope.

• Is the second dangerous? Yep! Dangerous for them.

What the ex-CIA just told us? Is this a Q proof (right from the Deep State)?

“Nominating someone who has a track record of pushing conspiracy theories … is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.

If people like this are saying similar things - is this a Q proof? It sounds like.

Let’s think logically:

The new DNI (with a track record of “conspiracy theories”) starts the job. What are the possible scenarios?

• The DNI gains the access to the best information in class and finds out that the “conspiracy theories” were just false … curing the brain from ever believing these type of theories again.

• The DNI gains the access and finds out that all these theories were true!

“… is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.

Let’s look at our scenarios:

• Is the first one dangerous? Nope.

• Is the second one dangerous? Yep! Dangerous for them.

What the ex-CIA just told us? Is this a Q proof (right from the Deep State)?

“Nominating someone who has a track record of pushing conspiracy theories … is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.

If people like this are saying similar things - is this a Q proof? It sounds like.

Let’s think logically:

The new DNI (with a track record of “conspiracy theories”) starts the job. What are the possible scenarios?

• The DNI gains the access to the best information in class and finds out that the “conspiracy theories” were just false … curing the brain from ever believing these type of theories again.

• The DNI gains the access and finds out that all these theories were true!

“… is not only irresponsible choice, but also dangerous”.

Let’s look at our scenarios:

• Is the first one dangerous? Nope.

• Is the second dangerous? Yep! Dangerous for them.

What the ex-CIA just told us? Is this a Q proof (right from the Deep State)?