"One would think that investigation would support the story if it were true. It would seem that it is the Jews who raise questions about the holocaust by placing it off limits for open discussion."

This is the crux of the whole matter...when prevailing truth is questioned and dissected it will either confirm a narrative or prove that in fact it was a revisionist position to make people believe a lie. Truth is always able to stand on its' own under scrutiny. I believe one who speaks truth welcomes confirmation of that truth through investigation and equally welcomes dispelling any falsehood of said truth through investigation. When certain subjects are verboten you HAVE to ask why....as Paul Craig Roberts has done. Good article...

"One would think that investigation would support the story if it were true. It would seem that it is the Jews who raise questions about the holocaust by placing it off limits for open discussion."

This is the crux of the whole matter...when prevailing truth is questioned and dissected it will either confirm a narrative or prove that in fact it was a revisionist position to make people believe a lie. Truth is always able to stand on its' own. I believe one who speaks truth welcomes confirmation of that truth through investigation and equally welcomes dispelling any falsehood of said truth through investigation. When certain subjects are verboten you HAVE to ask why....as Paul Craig Roberts has done. Good article...