Very inclined to think YES.
Like certain other players, there is a good possibility that he is playing "villain". What does this do?
It exaggerates the anti-Trump narrative which, as reality and true information emerges, only serves to awaken more people. Think how utterly ridiculous the Mika and Joe attacks have been. One week, Trump is Hitler going to destroy American, the next week, "oh, we went down and had breakfast, and we're going to try to work together going forward".
We might call this narrative whiplash. It drives home the impact of information by generating CONTRAST.
When someone comes on the Propaganda machine, and goes full TDS, it generates development. Some TDS get worse, they follow that chant. Others start to go, "seriously, this is getting ridiculous at this point".
Not everything that LOOKS bad for us is BAD for us. The last four years ALL worked to awaken America and deliver to Trump the election mandate he needs, even with the corrupt election system.
I think there are some that are truly DS and corrupt with or without TDS, and I think there are some that are playing that role, egging on the establishment, essentially Judas Goats.
You cannot tell simply by appearances. That is why, when you really look at Comey, his history, what he did in the 90's, where he did it, and the IMPACT of his actions, well, there is a LOT there to say he's a good guy working the 'villain' role.
Addendum: yesterday, I saw a quiz program dealing with "Operation Mincemeat" in WW2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mincemeat
The gist: the allies deployed a dead body dressed in military uniform (down to specific details) and carrying fake intel documents, in an operation to mislead the Nazis regarding the invasion of Sicily.
So, WW2. They do this sort of deception. The Great Awakening War is like WW2 but 1000 times greater in complexity and consequences. Is it really so hard to imagine that the good guys have certain players acting like villains in order to lead (or mislead) the enemy and advance narrative (5g) objectives?
As I asked in a previous post, if the President came to you and said, We need someone to (act this way) and (Advance this particular aspect of the narrative war) but (it means the people you serve i.e. patriots will have to think you are a scumbag) and (your reputation and legacy may be seriously hurt) but (we need people to do this), Can you?
How does a patriot respond?
Obviously, we have no direct proof, but that's why we have to go beyond appearances, and consider IMPACT, EFFECT in terms of moving the narrative (5G) war, and also BACKGROUND, PREVIOUS CONNECTIONS, to some extent too.
Very inclined to think YES.
Like certain other players, there is a good possibility that he is playing "villain". What does this do?
It exagerates the anti-Trump narrative which, as reality and true information emerges, only serves to awaken more people. Think how utterly ridiculous the Mika and Joe attacks have been. One week, Trump is Hitler going to destroy American, the next week, "oh, we went down and had breakfast, and we're going to try to work together going forward".
We might call this narrative whiplash. It drives home the impact of information by generating CONTRAST.
When someone comes on the Propaganda machine, and goes full TDS, it generates development. Some TDS get worse, they follow that chant. Others start to go, "seriously, this is getting ridiculous at this point".
Not everything that LOOKS bad for us is BAD for us. The last four years ALL worked to awaken America and deliver to Trump the election mandate he needs, even with the corrupt election system.
I think there are some that are truly DS and corrupt with or without TDS, and I think there are some that are playing that role, egging on the establishment, essentially Judas Goats.
You cannot tell simply by appearances. That is why, when you really look at Comey, his history, what he did in the 90's, where he did it, and the IMPACT of his actions, well, there is a LOT there to say he's a good guy working the 'villain' role.