Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well. He names some issues, and I have heard insurance claims workers lament having to do those exact things for financial reasons.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error seems to be, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in supporting “street justice”. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, which seems likely to be there, rather than going for a “gotcha!” Has he been kindly, repeatedly rebuked on his approach?

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well. He names some issues, and I have heard insurance claims workers lament having to do those exact things for financial reasons.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error seems to be, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in supporting “street justice”. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, which seems likely to be there, rather than going for a “gotcha!” Has he been kindly rebuked on his approach?

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well. He names some issues, and I have heard insurance claims workers lament having to do those exact things for financial reasons.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error seems to be, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in supporting “street justice”. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, which seems likely to be there, rather than going for a “gotcha!” Has he been rebuked on his approach?

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well. He names some issues, and I have heard insurance claims workers lament having to do those exact things for financial reasons.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error is, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in supporting “street justice”. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, which seems likely to be there, rather than going for a “gotcha!”

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error is, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in supporting “street justice”. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, which seems likely to be there, rather than going for a “gotcha!”

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error is, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in calling for “street justice”. “Rabble Rousing” as it used to be called. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, which seems likely to be there, rather than going for a “gotcha!”

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment, and we should also further aim for mercy and redemption where possible, rather than mere establishment of guilt and condemnation.

What this guy’s error is, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in calling for “street justice”. “Rabble Rousing” as it used to be called. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, rather than going for a “gotcha!”

Just a thought.

Can we pause for a moment and take a step back?

This is where both sides need to get looked at.

Many people here have called for executions of a lot of the people trying to bring us all into permanent slavery, or who were responsible for coof and that response, and for good reason.

Meanwhile, there are a lot of corrupt insurance companies / heads, who likely have some pretty severe crimes under their belts that likely need to be dealt with as well.

So what’s the difference, here?

Imo it’s whether we go French Revolution and start chopping off heads in the street, Jacobin/Robespierre style, or whether we go by calm headed Rule of Law and sound judgment.

What this guy’s error is, is not necessarily identification of a crime, but in calling for “street justice”. “Rabble Rousing” as it used to be called. It is quite possible that many of us have done that in a moment of anger. Does this man have a pattern of doing this? If so, find and record that pattern, rather than going for a “gotcha!”

Just a thought.