The Textus Receptus > Latin Vulgate in terms of accuracy to the original languages. The Catholic church didn't like when Textus Receptus, a superior work, was released.

The true churches knew what was real scripture and what wasn't. The Law and the Prophets were kept it in the Temple for centuries and the true churches would have known what that canon was, because they were all started by born-again Israelites.

Believers in Antioch, Syria collected the holy Scriptures, which formed the New Testament. Antioch is where followers of Messiah were first called Christians. They made many copies of the scriptures and shared them with other churches, and many believed in Messiah through their witness. (Satan countered by having philosophers in Alexandria, Egypt change the Syrian texts to fit their beliefs. Unbelieving philosophers in Alexandria Egypt, such as Origen, amended, added to and deleted many portions of the true text and then palmed off their work as the Word of God. The two most prominent of the corrupt Alexandrian codices are called the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus). These letters would obviously not have been known in full by the false Roman church usurpers, as they came in late to the game. Ears to hear? Anyways,

The Vaudois translated Scriptures into Latin centuries before Jerome butchered them. Their translation became known as the vulgate (literally the word 'common' in Latin) Bible, and it spread all the way to England before 200 AD. The harlot church and her daughters sure have a way of trademarking definitions, don't they? ('Catholic' literally means 'universal'. It's an adjective 😂 Could say the same for 'Pentecostal', 'Baptist', etc.)

Anyways, Jerome followed Origen’s teachings, so the same corruptions occurred in this Bible. It was completed in 405 AD. During the Dark Ages 500-1500 AD, the Catholic church killed millions of Christians for using translations they didn't like, and they burned the texts. They taught from their corrupt Jerome Latin Vulgate bible and forbid people to read others, even as Latin was being replaced by other languages leaving only them with its understanding. Quite convenient to have the priests be the only ones who can read the Scriptures, eh?

As copies of NT manuscripts have been collected over the years, they have formed two groups:

True Path – The ‘Majority Text’, which makes up 95% of 5,300+ existing manuscripts that are in agreement and form the basis for the Textus Receptus which is also called the ‘Received Text’ or ‘Byzantine Text’.

Corrupt Path – The ‘Minority Text’ which consists of only 5% of existing manuscripts. The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ‘Majority Text’ in 13,000 places.

Amazingly, modern Bible versions like the NIV and ESV are based on these ‘Minority Text’ manuscripts.

Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were written from 300-400 A.D., so because they’re ‘ancient’, modern Bible translators mistakenly think that they must be 'better'; but the Textus Receptus agrees with the earliest versions of the Bible: Peshitta (AD 150), the Vetus Latina (AD 157), the Italic Bible (AD 157) etc. These Bibles were produced some 200 years before Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.

So it makes no sense that the church would hide scripture as scripture as we know it as today is whatever the Vatican declared to be scripture.

Top. Kek.

Without these guys, the Bible we know might not even exist. People would’ve been arguing over what counts as Scripture, and the Church would’ve been a total mess.

Yeah, the false church would have been, without the light of Christ they would need to scramble quickly before they lost grasp on what the true Church put together in the midst of the whirlwind of error they spawned by trying to fit the Gospel into the Babylonian mystery schools. Johnny-come-latelies! Twisters and grifters, thieves deceiving and being deceived!

The Textus Receptus > Latin Vulgate in terms of accuracy to the original languages. The Catholic church got didn't like when Textus Receptus, a superior work, was released.

The true churches knew what was real scripture and what wasn't. The Law and the Prophets were kept it in the Temple for centuries and the true churches would have known what that canon was, because they were all started by born-again Israelites.

Believers in Antioch, Syria collected the holy Scriptures, which formed the New Testament. Antioch is where followers of Messiah were first called Christians. They made many copies of the scriptures and shared them with other churches, and many believed in Messiah through their witness. (Satan countered by having philosophers in Alexandria, Egypt change the Syrian texts to fit their beliefs. Unbelieving philosophers in Alexandria Egypt, such as Origen, amended, added to and deleted many portions of the true text and then palmed off their work as the Word of God. The two most prominent of the corrupt Alexandrian codices are called the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus). These letters would obviously not have been known in full by the false Roman church usurpers, as they came in late to the game. Ears to hear? Anyways,

The Vaudois translated Scriptures into Latin centuries before Jerome butchered them. Their translation became known as the vulgate (literally the word 'common' in Latin) Bible, and it spread all the way to England before 200 AD. The harlot church and her daughters sure have a way of trademarking definitions, don't they? ('Catholic' literally means 'universal'. It's an adjective 😂 Could say the same for 'Pentecostal', 'Baptist', etc.)

Anyways, Jerome followed Origen’s teachings, so the same corruptions occurred in this Bible. It was completed in 405 AD. During the Dark Ages 500-1500 AD, the Catholic church killed millions of Christians for using translations they didn't like, and they burned the texts. They taught from their corrupt Jerome Latin Vulgate bible and forbid people to read others, even as Latin was being replaced by other languages leaving only them with its understanding. Quite convenient to have the priests be the only ones who can read the Scriptures, eh?

As copies of NT manuscripts have been collected over the years, they have formed two groups:

True Path – The ‘Majority Text’, which makes up 95% of 5,300+ existing manuscripts that are in agreement and form the basis for the Textus Receptus which is also called the ‘Received Text’ or ‘Byzantine Text’.

Corrupt Path – The ‘Minority Text’ which consists of only 5% of existing manuscripts. The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ‘Majority Text’ in 13,000 places.

Amazingly, modern Bible versions like the NIV and ESV are based on these ‘Minority Text’ manuscripts.

Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were written from 300-400 A.D., so because they’re ‘ancient’, modern Bible translators mistakenly think that they must be 'better'; but the Textus Receptus agrees with the earliest versions of the Bible: Peshitta (AD 150), the Vetus Latina (AD 157), the Italic Bible (AD 157) etc. These Bibles were produced some 200 years before Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.

So it makes no sense that the church would hide scripture as scripture as we know it as today is whatever the Vatican declared to be scripture.

Top. Kek.

Without these guys, the Bible we know might not even exist. People would’ve been arguing over what counts as Scripture, and the Church would’ve been a total mess.

Yeah, the false church would have been, without the light of Christ they would need to scramble quickly before they lost grasp on what the true Church put together in the midst of the whirlwind of error they spawned by trying to fit the Gospel into the Babylonian mystery schools. Johnny-come-latelies! Twisters and grifters, thieves deceiving and being deceived!