IF the 16th indeed does that.
1: From memory I recall that during a court-case the judge ruled that the 16th did not grant new taxing power.
So, if in 1898 is was ruled unconstitutional, and later it was ruled, no new powers were granted by the 16th, then it follows: IRS contributions are unconstitutional, unless .... you declared yourself guilty to it.
Or do employers not by default shove a certification to that effect under your nose as part of your on boarding as an employee?
Do employers enter into contract with the IRS to do these things?
Hence, voluntary. But there are ways to unburden yourself by what has been.
2: 16th was never ratified. The amendment is not part of the Constitution. It has no function in law, or consequences in law. Null and void. This is well documented to be the case.
- IRS is Puerto Rico based for a reason. And so is the FED. Mainland controlled by possession. You gotta love the irony in that.
IF the 16th indeed does that.
1: From memory I recall that during a court-case the judge rules that the 16th did not grant new taxing power.
So, if in 1898 is was rules unconstitutional, and later it was ruled, no new powers were granted by the 16th, then it follows: IRS contributions are unconstitutional, unless .... you declared yourself guilty to it.
Or do employers not by default shove a certification to that effect under your nose as part of your on boarding as an employee?
Do employers enter into contract with the IRS to do these things?
Hence, voluntary. But there are ways to unburden yourself by what has been.
2: 16th was never ratified. The amendment is not part of the Constitution. It has no function in law, or consequences in law. Null and void. This is well documented to be the case.
- IRS is Puerto Rico based for a reason. And so is the FED. Mainland controlled by possession. You gotta love the irony in that.