The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS
There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.
This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.
Same with any virus.
No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.
Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.
ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.
That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).
An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.
No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.
They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.
Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.
But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.
It is called the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.
ALL the so-called "research" that people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...
NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.
Anybody can create a computer program, and can create it to arrive at per-determined conclusions if they want, and they can run all sorts of simulations.
That MIGHT, in some cases, provide a good starting point for real research, but at some point, they have to take it into the real world (a lab) and test something REAL that exists in reality, and not just a theoretical computer model.
NOBODY HAS EVER TESTED SARS-CoV-2 in the REAL world, because NOBODY HAS A SAMPLE OF IT.
End of debate.
All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.
The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS
There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.
This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.
Same with any virus.
No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.
Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.
ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.
That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).
An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.
No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.
They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.
Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.
But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.
It is calle the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.
ALL the so-called "research" that people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...
NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.
Anybody can create a computer program, and can create it to arrive at per-determined conclusions if they want, and they can run all sorts of simulations.
That MIGHT, in some cases, provide a good starting point for real research, but at some point, they have to take it into the real world (a lab) and test something REAL that exists in reality, and not just a theoretical computer model.
NOBODY HAS EVER TESTED SARS-CoV-2 in the REAL world, because NOBODY HAS A SAMPLE OF IT.
End of debate.
All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.
The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS
There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.
This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.
Same with any virus.
No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.
Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.
ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.
That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).
An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.
No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.
They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.
Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.
But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.
It is calle the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.
ALL the so-called "research" that people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...
NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.
End of debate.
All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.
The length of the loops of the spike on the FCS
There is no spike protein, because there is no virus.
This is like debating how long the horn is on a unicorn. First, you have to prove that a unicorn even exists.
Same with any virus.
No lab ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD has any sample of SARS-CoV-2 ... because it does not exist.
Virology turns out to be a scam fake science.
ALL virologists who think they are studying a virus use the same process to do so.
That process CREATES "artifacts" (pieces of material/debris).
An electron microscope is the ONLY type of microscope used to study this.
No human can SEE DIRECTLY anything in/from an electron microscope.
They use a process to produce photos from the electron microscope.
Those photos are what virologists use to claim to "see" this or that.
But what they are actually looking at in those photos is the debris from the PROCESS that was used to end up with those photos.
It is calle the "cytopathic effect." It is the end result of this process, which is a FRAUDULENT process.
ALL the so-called "research" the people point to to "prove" this or that about the genome, or the spike protein, or anything else related to the "virus" ... is done IN SILICO -- which means a computer program, and NOT a real world test lab with a real virus sample, because ...
NO LABORATORY IN THE WORLD HAS ANY SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2.
End of debate.
All these lab leak stories are limited hangouts to divert from the truth.