I have been listening to David for 20 years. His brain is storing a phenomenal amount of pertinent data. He talks about, and can do, woo woo I personally know of, so in a way we are two birds of a feather. Two odd ducks actually. And I am very aware of why some take him with a grain of salt. But when he is right, is he ever.

David is an information junkie. His supporters love him like an eccentric friend, not like a cult leader. He absolutely does mean well. Everything he learns he tries to share. He does pick the brains of other researchers but he give credit. But anyone putting themselves out there on the internet and saying what they think, is going to be criticized to death.

I have been listening to David for 20 years. His brain is storing a phenomenal amount of pertinent data. He talks about. And can do, woo woo I personally know of, so in a way we are two birds of a feather. Two odd ducks actually. And I am very aware of why some take him with a grain of salt. But when he is right, is he ever.

David is an information junkie. His supporters love him like an eccentric friend, not like a cult leader. He absolutely does mean well. Everything he learns he tries to share. He does pick the brains of other researchers but he give credit. But anyone putting themselves out there on the internet and saying what they think, is going to be criticized to death.

I have been listening to David for 20 years. His brain is storing a phenomenal amount of pertinent data. He talks about woo woo I personally know of, so in a way we are two birds of a feather. Two odd ducks actually. And I am very aware of why some take him with a grain of salt. But when he is right, is he ever.

David is an information junkie. His supporters love him like an eccentric friend, not like cult leader. He absolutely does mean well. Everything he learns he tries to share. He does pick the brains of other researchers but he give credit.