I know more than you realize, and perhaps enough to realize what you confidently don't know as well. I don't know if its the internet always seeming like people are looking to pick fights but that attempt to undermine what I know with outdated information in an aggressive wrapper only undermines your entire failed attempt at what smells like a disinformation attempt completely.

It's OK. I don't need to convince you, and you can't possibly convince me to ignore what I know.

Your last line there is repeating what I taught you already. You absorbed that much, it's Ok to learn a little more. But you don't have to if you don't want to. Just remember, the only thing you can't do is make others forget.

Some new words I can teach you are "coherent neutrino scattering." If I was wrong in my initial assessment of your aggressive intention, those words should help you learn something new and bring you back with an apology.
If I was correct however, you might just find yourself even more aggressively tasked with denying the modern neutrino detection technologies that directly prove you are out of your element discussing this topic... something that makes your aggressive lies make one wonder "cui bono?"

Aggressively lying like this isn't just some random thing. You've been caught. Cui Bono? Ego? or Evil?

I know more than you realize, and perhaps enough to realize what you confidently don't know as well. I don't know if its the internet always seeming like people are looking to pick fights but that attempt to undermine what I know with outdated information in an aggressive wrapper only undermines your entire failed attempt at what smells like a disinformation attempt completely.

It's OK. I don't need to convince you, and you can't possibly convince me to ignore what I know.

Your last line there is repeating what I taught you already. You absorbed that much, it's Ok to learn a little more. But you don't have to if you don't want to. Just remember, the only thing you can't do is make others forget.

Some new words I can teach you are "coherent neutrino scattering." If I was wrong in my initial assessment of your aggressive intention, those words should help you learn something new and bring you back with an apology.
If I was correct however, you might just find yourself even more aggressively tasked with denying the modern neutrino detection technologies that directly prove you are out of your element discussing this topic... something that makes your aggressive lies make one wonder "cui bono?"

Aggressively lying like this isn't just some random thing. You've been caught. Cui Bono?

I know more than you realize, and perhaps enough to realize what you confidently don't know as well. I don't know if its the internet always seeming like people are looking to pick fights but that attempt to undermine what I know with outdated information in an aggressive wrapper only undermines your entire failed attempt at what smells like a disinformation attempt completely.

It's OK. I don't need to convince you, and you can't possibly convince me to ignore what I know.

Your last line there is repeating what I taught you already. You absorbed that much, it's Ok to learn a little more. But you don't have to if you don't want to. Just remember, the only thing you can't do is make others forget.

Some new words I can teach you are "coherent neutrino scattering." If I was wrong in my initial assessment of your aggressive intention, those words should help you learn something new and bring you back with an apology.
If I was correct however, you might just find yourself even more aggressively tasked with denying the modern neutrino detection technologies that directly prove you are out of your element discussing this topic... something that makes your aggressive lies make one wonder "qui bono?"

I know more than you realize, and perhaps enough to realize what you confidently don't know as well. I don't know if its the internet always seeming like people are looking to pick fights but that attempt to undermine what I know with outdated information in an aggressive wrapper only undermines your entire failed attempt at what smells like a disinformation attempt completely.

It's OK. I don't need to convince you, and you can't possibly convince me to ignore what I know.

Your last line there is repeating what I taught you already. You absorbed that much, it's Ok to learn a little more. But you don't have to if you don't want to. Just remember, the only thing you can't do is make others forget.

Some new words I can teach you are "oherent neutrino scattering." If I was wrong in my initial assessment of your aggressive intention, those words should help you learn something new and bring you back with an apology.
If I was correct however, you might just find yourself even more aggressively tasked with denying the modern neutrino detection technologies that directly prove you are out of your element discussing this topic... something that makes your aggressive lies make one wonder "qui bono?"

I know more than you realize, and perhaps enough to realize what you confidently don't know as well.

It's OK. I don't need to convince you, and you can't possibly convince me to ignore what I know.

Your last line there is repeating what I taught you already. You absorbed that much, it's Ok to learn a little more. But you don't have to if you don't want to. Just remember, the only thing you can't do is make others forget.