And here is a general disregard for a ruling from the Supreme Court.

The ruling that the President is within his article powers, and the challenge to deportation should be a habeus claim in the closest court to the prison (i.e. not a federal court), is like a reprimand from within the judiciary hierarchy itself: reprimanding the feral judges who are attempting to interfere with executive actions. This current emerging issue is not even about the judiciary interacting with the executive branch (and the powers are meant to be kept separated, etc.).

Do the SC have a mechanism to disbar or impeach judges, for going against their ruling? (mind you, it was 5-4, so ther is some disagreement).

Anyway, what's the feral judge's excuse this time?

That venue question turns on whether these transfer claims belong in habeas corpus proceedings or instead may be brought under the Administrative Procedure Act. I agree with the Court’s analysis that the claims must be brought in habeas,” Justice Kavanaugh

Instead, Boasberg desperately clings to the APA route, which has already failed, BTW. Chances are, it will fail again, on the taxpayers dime, no less.

And here is a general disregard for a ruling from the Supreme Court.

The ruling that the President is within his article powers, is like a reprimand from within the judiciary hierarchy itself: reprimanding the feral judges who are attempting to interfere with executive actions. This current issue is not even about the judiciary interacting with the executive branch (and the powers are meant to be kept separated, etc.).

Do the SC have a mechanism to disbar or impeach judges, for going against their ruling?

Anyway, what's the feral judge's excuse this time?

That venue question turns on whether these transfer claims belong in habeas corpus proceedings or instead may be brought under the Administrative Procedure Act. I agree with the Court’s analysis that the claims must be brought in habeas,” Justice Kavanaugh

Instead, Boasberg desperately clings to the APA route, whih has already failed.

And here is a general disregard for a ruling from the Supreme Court.

The ruling that the President is within his article powers, is like a reprimand from within the judiciary hierarchy itself: reprimanding the feral judges who are attempting to interfere with executive actions. This current issue is not even about the judiciary interacting with the executive branch (and the powers are meant to be kept separated, etc.).

Do the SC have a mechanism to disbar or impeach judges, for going against their ruling?

Anyway, what's the feral judge's excuse this time?

And they are disregarding a ruling from the Supreme Court. That is like a reprimand from the judiciary hierarchy.

Do the SC have a mechanism to disbar or impeach judges, for doing that?