And you think an IMMORTAL, DEATHLESS CONGLOMERATE OWNED BY FOREIGN IMVESTORS would be better off owning the land forever?

You haven't made any case. The land is fine as it is. Any changes to this situation are nothing but negatives for the vast majority of people.

The only argument I ever heard is "the government should own zero land" which is a statement as retarded and meaningless and void of argument as "no human is illegal".

It's some gay libertarian bullshit and libertarians are overwhelmingly traitors as proven over and over again.

And you think an IMMORTAL, DEATHLESS PRIVATE CONGLOMERATE would be better off owning the land forever?