I am very reluctant to talk about certain topics. My investigation has provided certain "conclusions." I use that word loosely, because I don't have "beliefs" per se. On the contrary, my "conclusions" are in constant flux as new evidence presents itself. However, some things are very well supported by the evidence, without any reasonable contrary evidence. And some of that evidence, and the "conclusions" are contrary to deeply held beliefs. I didn't want to find those contrary beliefs. On the contrary, most of them began at least somewhat inline with the "mainstream" (by mainstream, I mean what most on this board would consider "obviously true").

Here's a few examples of those "mainstream" beliefs:

The Jews that are doing terrible things are not the real Jews.

Islam was organically created, not a purposefully designed controlled opposition program. Most people here probably wouldn't have that big of a problem with that but...

Christianity (as we think of it today) was organically created...

More specifically, most believe that the "original" Church, as solidified between the fourth and fifth centuries, and even more solidified by Martin Luther et al were directly inspired by God (I prefer The Source of all Things, or Source for short instead of "God." Too many inappropriate connotations imo.).

People believe that YHWH is Source.

People believe that Allah is Source.

People believe that Christianity and Muslim were not designed and paid for by the same group to be Controlled Opposition programs to control the world.

So if I find substantial evidence contrary to those beliefs, and that it all ties to a 3000+ year program designed to control the world by an Elite group of Jews (not "fake" Jews)...

Every time I address these things, and/or try to present the evidence, the cognitive dissonance proves reasonable conversation impossible. People don't want to listen, no matter how good the evidence is. Indeed, the better the evidence is, the less they want to listen...

So for now I'll leave it at Fugger. I'd like to go down to the Crusades, but that's the beginning of the rabbit hole that falls down the hole..

I am very reluctant to talk about certain topics. My investigation has provided certain "conclusions." I use that word loosely, because I don't have "beliefs" per se. On the contrary, my "conclusions" are in constant flux as new evidence presents itself. However, some things are very well supported by the evidence, without any reasonable contrary evidence. And some of that evidence, and the "conclusions" are contrary to deeply held beliefs. I didn't want to find those contrary beliefs. On the contrary, most of them began at least somewhat inline with the "mainstream" (by mainstream, I mean what most on this board would consider "obviously true").

Here's a few examples of those "mainstream" beliefs:

The Jews that are doing terrible things are not the real Jews.

Islam was organically created, not a purposefully designed controlled opposition program. Most people here probably wouldn't have that big of a problem with that but...

Christianity (as we think of it today) was organically created...

More specifically, most believe that the "original" Church, as solidified between the fourth and fifth centuries, and even more solidified by Martin Luther et al were directly inspired by God (I prefer The Source of all Things, or Source for short instead of "God." Too many, imo, inappropriate connotations).

People believe that YHWH is Source.

People believe that Allah is Source.

People believe that Christianity and Muslim were not designed and paid for by the same group to be Controlled Opposition programs to control the world.

So if I find substantial evidence contrary to those beliefs, and that it all ties to a 3000+ year program designed to control the world by an Elite group of Jews (not "fake" Jews)...

Every time I address these things, and/or try to present the evidence, the cognitive dissonance proves reasonable conversation impossible. People don't want to listen, no matter how good the evidence is. Indeed, the better the evidence is, the less they want to listen...

So for now I'll leave it at Fugger. I'd like to go down to the Crusades, but that's the beginning of the rabbit hole that falls down the hole..

I am very reluctant to talk about certain topics. My investigation has provided certain "conclusions." I use that word loosely, because I don't have "beliefs" per se. On the contrary, my "conclusions" are in constant flux as new evidence presents itself. However, some things are very well supported by the evidence, without any reasonable contrary evidence. And some of that evidence, and the "conclusions" are contrary to deeply held beliefs. I didn't want to find those contrary beliefs. On the contrary, most of them began at least somewhat inline with the "mainstream" (by mainstream, I mean what most on this board would consider "obviously true").

Here's a few examples of those "mainstream" beliefs:

The Jews that are doing terrible things are not the real Jews.

Islam was organically created, not a purposefully designed controlled opposition program. Most people probably here wouldn't have that big of a problem with that but...

Christianity (as we think of it today) was organically created...

More specifically, most believe that the "original" Church, as solidified between the fourth and fifth centuries, and even more solidified by Martin Luther et al were directly inspired by God (I prefer The Source of all Things, or Source for short instead of "God." Too many, imo, inappropriate connotations).

People believe that YHWH is Source.

People believe that Allah is Source.

People believe that Christianity and Muslim were not designed and paid for by the same group to be Controlled Opposition programs to control the world.

So if I find substantial evidence contrary to those beliefs, and that it all ties to a 3000+ year program designed to control the world by an Elite group of Jews (not "fake" Jews)...

Every time I address these things, and/or try to present the evidence, the cognitive dissonance proves reasonable conversation impossible. People don't want to listen, no matter how good the evidence is. Indeed, the better the evidence is, the less they want to listen...

So for now I'll leave it at Fugger. I'd like to go down to the Crusades, but that's the beginning of the rabbit hole that falls down the hole..

I am very reluctant to talk about certain topics. My investigation has provided certain "conclusions." I use that word loosely, because I don't have "beliefs" per se. On the contrary, my "conclusions" are in constant flux as new evidence presents itself. However, some things are very well supported by the evidence, without any reasonable contrary evidence. And some of that evidence, and the "conclusions" are contrary to deeply held beliefs. I didn't want to find those contrary beliefs. On the contrary, most of them began at least somewhat inline with the "mainstream" (by mainstream, I mean what most on this board would consider "obviously true").

Here's a few examples of those "mainstream" beliefs:

The Jews that are doing terrible things are not the real Jews.

Islam was organically created, not a purposefully designed controlled opposition program. Most people probably here wouldn't have that big of a problem with that but...

Christianity (as we think of it today) was organically created...

More specifically, most believe that the "original" Church, as solidified between the fourth and fifth centuries, and even more solidified by Martin Luther et al were directly inspired by God (I prefer The Source of all Things, or Source for short instead of "God." Too many, imo, inappropriate connotations).

People believe that YHWH is Source.

People believe that Allah is Source.

People believe that Christianity and Muslim were not designed and paid for by the same group to be Controlled Opposition programs to control the world.

So if I find substantial evidence contrary to those beliefs, and that it all ties to a 3000+ year program designed to control the world by an Elite group of Jews (not "fake" Jews)...

Every time I address these things, and/or try to present the evidence, the cognitive dissonance proves reasonable conversation impossible. People don't want to listen, no matter how good the evidence is. Indeed, the better the evidence is, the less they want to listen...

So for now I'll leave it at Fugger. I'd like to go down to the Crusades, but that's the beginning of the rabbit hole that directly conflicts with the previous beliefs.

I am very reluctant to talk about certain topics. My investigation has provided certain "conclusions." I use that word loosely, because I don't have "beliefs" per se. On the contrary, my "conclusions" are in constant flux as new evidence presents itself. However, some things are very well supported by the evidence, without any reasonable contrary evidence. And some of that evidence, and the "conclusions" are contrary to deeply held beliefs. I didn't want to find those contrary beliefs. On the contrary, most of them began at least somewhat inline with the "mainstream" (by mainstream, I mean what most on this board would consider "obviously true").

Here's a few examples of those "mainstream" beliefs:

The Jews that are doing terrible things are not the real Jews.

Islam was organically created, not a purposefully designed controlled opposition program. Most people probably here wouldn't have that big of a problem with that but...

Christianity (as we think of it today) was organically created...

More specifically, most believe that the "original" Church, as solidified between the fourth and fifth centuries, and even more solidified by Martin Luther et al were directly inspired by God (I prefer The Source of all Things, or Source for short instead of "God." Too many, imo, inappropriate connotations).

People believe that Christianity and Muslim were not designed and paid for by the same group to be Controlled Opposition programs to control the world.

So if I find substantial evidence contrary to those beliefs, and that it all ties to a 3000+ year program designed to control the world by an Elite group of Jews (not "fake" Jews)...

Every time I address these things, and/or try to present the evidence, the cognitive dissonance proves reasonable conversation impossible. People don't want to listen, no matter how good the evidence is. Indeed, the better the evidence is, the less they want to listen...

So for now I'll leave it at Fugger. I'd like to go down to the Crusades, but that's the beginning of the rabbit hole that directly conflicts with the previous beliefs.

I am very reluctant to talk about certain topics. My investigation has provided certain "conclusions." I use that word loosely, because I don't have "beliefs" per se. On the contrary, my "conclusions" are in constant flux as new evidence presents itself. However, some things are very well supported by the evidence, without any reasonable contrary evidence. And some of that evidence, and the "conclusions" are contrary to deeply held beliefs. I didn't want to find those contrary beliefs. On the contrary, most of them began at least somewhat inline with the "mainstream" (by mainstream, I mean what most on this board would consider "obviously true").

Here's a few examples of those "mainstream" beliefs:

The Jews that are doing terrible things are not the real Jews.

Islam was organically created (not a purposefully designed controlled opposition program). Most people probably here wouldn't have that big of a problem with that but...

Christianity (as we think of it today) was organically created...

More specifically, most believe that the "original" Church, as solidified between the fourth and fifth centuries, and even more solidified by Martin Luther et al were directly inspired by God (I prefer The Source of all Things, or Source for short instead of "God." Too many, imo, inappropriate connotations).

People believe that Christianity and Muslim were not designed and paid for by the same group to be Controlled Opposition programs to control the world.

So if I find substantial evidence contrary to those beliefs, and that it all ties to a 3000+ year program designed to control the world by an Elite group of Jews (not "fake" Jews)...

Every time I address these things, and/or try to present the evidence, the cognitive dissonance proves reasonable conversation impossible. People don't want to listen, no matter how good the evidence is. Indeed, the better the evidence is, the less they want to listen...

So for now I'll leave it at Fugger. I'd like to go down to the Crusades, but that's the beginning of the rabbit hole that directly conflicts with the previous beliefs.