Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without any codex/rule, then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from using addition alone. Then if you treat the number 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then this number would easily be closer to ~20.

Point being, I could easily scour Trump's tweets to find Hail Satan in abundance, if that's what I were looking for.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without any codex/rule, then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from using addition alone. Then if you treat the number 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then this number would easily be closer to ~20.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without any codex/rule, then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from using addition alone. Then if you treat the number 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then I'd assume this number would be much closer to ~20.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without a codex/rule, then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from using addition alone. Then if you treat the number 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then I'd assume this number would be much closer to ~20.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without a codex (rule), then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from using addition alone. Then if you treat the number 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then I'd assume this number would be much closer to ~20.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without a codex (rule), then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from using addition alone. Then if you treat 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then I'd assume this number would be much closer to ~20.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without a codex (rule), then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from. Then if you treat 123 as a Gematria summation, you would have, on average, ~10 letters to form any thought from the entire alphabet.

If weighted for linguistic letter value vs Gematria value (a is used more than z) then I'd assume this number would be much closer to ~20.

Yeah, disappointing. Gematria, at least as I've seen it popularly used, is fundamentally illogical and is not a cypher but more like casting runes.

Of course saying ABC = 123 is valid, but once you begin manipulating 123 without a codex (rule), then 123 can become the limit of mental gymnastics and fundamentally invalid.

If casting off logic, then ABC/123 alone has 36 variations to pick & choose from.