regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using explicitly and openly fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
Some resources for when I turn this into a thread:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces#cite_note-9
The crests of many collegiate fraternities and sororities feature the fasces, including those of Chi Phi, Alpha Phi Delta, Sigma Alpha Mu, Phi Beta Sigma, and Psi Upsilon
https://web.archive.org/web/20260206201704/https://www.govmint.com/learn/post/a-fascist-u-s-dime
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using explicitly and openly fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
Some resources for when I turn this into a thread:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces#cite_note-9
The crests of many collegiate fraternities and sororities feature the fasces, including those of Chi Phi, Alpha Phi Delta, Sigma Alpha Mu, Phi Beta Sigma, and Psi Upsilon
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using explicitly and openly fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
Some resources for when I turn this into a thread:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces#cite_note-9
The crests of many collegiate fraternities and sororities feature the fasces, including those of Chi Phi, Alpha Phi Delta, Sigma Alpha Mu, Phi Beta Sigma, and Psi Upsilon
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using explicitly and openly fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
Some resources for when I turn this into a thread:
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using explicitly and openly fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
Some resources for when I turn this into a thread:
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using explicitly and openly fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but also as the New Deal and accompanying beaurocracy were explicitly designed using fascist principles and symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could indicate the start of admiralty law being imposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace. This actually seems more plausible than my take, as I couldn’t ever find a solid basis for the context of the fasces switching from symbolizing “authority of the state” to Americans-at-large hijacking the symbol to mean “we are the state now!” whereas not only there would be plenty of reason for admiralty impos(t)ers to install their symbolism, but symbolism will be their downfall.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.
regarding fasces, are you postulating that the emergence of these in the early 1900s with architecture, etc, indicates possibly a resurgence of statist-type thinking in the US at that time?
I had previously been suspecting that it might have indicated a different understanding of what the fasces meant, by at least the higher echelons of authority, if not by the people as well.
Your comment has me thinking it could have started being reimposed over the American system in the period between the 1871ish bankruptcy and the end of WWII, with TPTSNB, as you note, establishing and declaring their Esauian authority over the land and populace.
Really interesting Biblical tie-in!
I’m at a point where I’d wager there’s a lot of glossed-over history we could glean from the post-Lincoln to TR/Taft years, especially with McKinley and Grant.