Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Um, yes. This is what I've been saying the whole time Op's analogy is wrong u/bluewhiteandred's analogy is correct... Ok, I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just not paying attention to the conversation and not just trying to be a troll

/u/bluewhiteandred Had a good analogy. You said it wasn't good. I said that you were wrong in saying that because judges obviously cant be incentivized that way. I also said in my first reply that there are better ways to hold judges accountable and listed a few. I never one said they shouldn't be held accountable. I only said they cant be held accountable in the way that OP said because of the obvious fallacy which I explained clearly and also provided examples.....If you are still trying to say i'm wrong then are you just mad because you know I'm right or what? You seem to have a weird problem with logic and paying attention peoples points when you get proven wrong...Honestly bro, you kinda argue like a liberal. You need to have a little more humility when you are obviously incorrect on a something....I mean, if you honestly cant understand how a judge cant be impartial with an extreme conflict of interest then maybe just don't get involved in this subject mater anymore....

104 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Um, yes. This is what I've been saying the whole time Op's analogy is wrong u/bluewhiteandred's analogy is correct... Ok, I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just not paying attention to the conversation and not just trying to be a troll

/u/bluewhiteandred Had a good analogy. You said it wasn't good. I said that you were wrong in saying that because judges obviously cant be incentivized that way. I also said in my first reply that there are better ways to hold judges accountable and listed a few. I never one said they shouldn't be held accountable. I only said they cant be held accountable in the way that OP said because of the obvious fallacy which I explained clearly and also provided examples.....Are you just made because I'm right or what? You seem to have a weird problem with logic and paying attention peoples points when you get proven wrong...Honestly bro, you kinda argue like a liberal. You need to have a little more humility when you are obviously incorrect on a something....I mean, if you honestly cant understand how a judge cant be impartial with an extreme conflict of interest then maybe just don't get involved in this subject mater anymore....

104 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Ok, I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just not paying attention to the conversation and not just trying to be a troll

/u/bluewhiteandred Had a good analogy. You said it wasn't good. I said that you were wrong in saying that because judges obviously cant be incentivized that way. I also said in my first reply that there are better ways to hold judges accountable and listed a few. I never one said they shouldn't be held accountable. I only said they cant be held accountable in the way that OP said because of the obvious fallacy which I explained clearly and also provided examples.....Are you just made because I'm right or what? You seem to have a weird problem with logic and paying attention peoples points when you get proven wrong...Honestly bro, you kinda argue like a liberal. You need to have a little more humility when you are obviously incorrect on a something....I mean, if you honestly cant understand how a judge cant be impartial with an extreme conflict of interest then maybe just don't get involved in this subject mater anymore....

104 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Ok, I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt that you are just not paying attention to the conversation and not just trying to be a troll

/u/bluewhiteandred Had a good analogy. You said it wasn't good. I said that you were wrong in saying that because judges obviously cant be incentivized that way. I also said in my first reply that there are better ways to hold judges accountable and listed a few. I never one said they shouldn't be held accountable. I only said they cant be held accountable in the way that OP said because of the obvious fallacy which I explained clearly and also provided examples.....Are you just made because I'm right or what? You seem to have a weird problem with logic and paying attention peoples points when you get proven wrong...Honestly bro, you kinda argue like a liberal. You need to have a little more humility when you are obviously incorrect on a something.

104 days ago
1 score