1. I never said I supported it. I pointed out some logical plotholes in your argument.

2. Yes, there are statistically more heterosexual pedophiles than homosexual pedophiles. Mostly because heterosexuals drastically outnumber homosexuals in the general population. "Per capita" was not mentioned anywhere in the conversation we had previously. Also, there is no credible evidence that there's a higher rate of pedophilia, per capita, amongst homsexuals than heterosexuals.

Now that we've addressed you trying to poison the well here:

Dead people/noncitizen voters on voter rolls aren't equal to all of those votes being used frauduently in elections.

If the investigation turns up nothing, are you going to accept the votes were valid?

What do you think is going to be different about any investigation into this election that will suddenly result in finding credible evidence of significant voter fraud, that has NEVER been found by the dozens of investigstions that have previously been conducted before?

To be clear, I don't object to there being more investigations. I'm just pointing out facts, cautioning others to not get their hopes up while keeping the door open by asking others if they know of any reason why this case would be different, like I just asked you.

1. I never said I supported it. I pointed out some logical plotholes in your argument.

2. Yes, there are statistically more heterosexual pedophiles than homosexual pedophiles. Mostly because heterosexuals drastically outnumber homosexuals in the general population. "Per capita" was not mentioned anywhere in the conversation we had previously. Also, there is no credible evidence that there's a higher rate of pedophilia, per capita, amongst homsexuals than heterosexuals.

Now that we've addressed you trying to poison the well here:

Dead people/noncitizen voters on voter rolls aren't equal to all of those votes being used frauduently in elections.

If the investigation turns up nothing, are you going to accept the votes were valid?

What do you think is going to be different about any investigation into this election that will suddenly result in finding significant evidence of voter fraud, that has NEVER been found by the dozens of investigstions that have previously been conducted before?

To be clear, I don't object to there being more investigations. I'm just pointing out facts, cautioning others to not get their hopes up while keeping the door open by asking others if they know of any reason why this case would be different, like I just asked you.