I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to help create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, in 1900, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time (or even heard of by the vast majority of the planet) until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PTB didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to help create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, in 1900, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PTB didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, in 1900, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PTB didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PTB didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation and the PBT didn't care. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper quartile (at best) of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. Why? I don't know. I can only show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was allowed by the PTB. Maybe digging further will reveal that printing motivation, maybe not. Like I said, it wasn't a big deal at the time until it was a movie. Maybe it was an intentional revelation. Maybe it was controlled opposition. However, all evidence shows that it was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with because it was allowed information. It was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was published by "so many" to begin with was because it was allowed information. It was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality across the whole western world.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers by the 1870s (and by the Rothschilds before them). All information was controlled. It was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA the elite or at least upper middle class). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers. All information was controlled. It was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality.

In it's book form, the only people who read books like that were themselves well off (AKA elite). Even assuming every book printed was read by three people (which is being VERY generous, and was probably less then one per book), that would be a readership of 30,000 people. That level of readership is miniscule, and was pushed into, we'll call it, the upper third of the world. In MOVIE form on the other hand, it was pushed onto everyone.

In addition, Rockefeller (et al) controlled all the publishers. All information was controlled. It was pushed in movie form because it was useful to create the inversion to the masses.

I was talking about it being a MOVIE, which was the context of this exposure (in the OP). The reason it was made into a movie was to create an inversion of reality.