I am just curious on your alls opinion on the father being charged with murder? Isn’t what he did AT WORST accessory or something? I guess they will say he clearly knew and provided the gun intending the murders occur. I guess I am just curious why he’s charged with murder when the 14 year old is the one who committed murder. Is there actual precedent for this or are they warping the law the fit their agenda? What is next, you loan out a car to someone and they run a crowd over now your a murderer? LOL!

Edit: my main concern in all of this is just the dangerous legal precedent. Who decided the gun was bought for the kid, why did the FBI not do anything, etc

I am just curious on your alls opinion on the father being charged with murder? Isn’t what he did AT WORST accessory or something? I guess they will say he clearly knew and provided the gun intending the murders occur. I guess I am just curious why he’s charged with murder when the 14 year old is the one who committed murder. Is there actual precedent for this or are they warping the law the fit their agenda? What is next, you loan out a car to someone and they run a crowd over now your a murderer? LOL!