Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce link to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce link to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
(watch 1st 25 seconds of the YT Sauce link to understand)

View and highest quality available.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie.
(watch first 25 seconds of sauce link below or you will NOT understand)


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304


SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:
https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

⬆️⬆️⬆️
DID YOU Watch just 25 seconds of the above sauce?
If not then you Will. Not. Understand.

Over 25 comments so far and only ONE additional view on the above clip that proves the entire OP.

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/


Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced LITTLE OF NO radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

1 day ago
165 score
Reason: Format and typos

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce link to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce link to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
(watch 1st 25 seconds of the YT Sauce link to understand)

YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie.
(watch first 25 seconds of sauce link below or you will NOT understand)


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304


SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:
https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

⬆️⬆️⬆️
DID YOU Watch just 25 seconds of the above sauce?
If not then you Will. Not. Understand.

Over 25 comments so far and only ONE additional view on the above clip that proves the entire OP.

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/


Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced LITTLE OF NO radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

1 day ago
163 score
Reason: None provided.

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce links to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce links to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
(See Sauce links to understand)

YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie.
(See Sauce links to understand)


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304


SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:
https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

⬆️⬆️⬆️
DID YOU Watch 20 seconds of the above sauce?
If not then you Will. Not. Understand.

Over 25 comments so far and only ONE additional view on the above clip that proves the entire OP.

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/


Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
65 score
Reason: Smh... more context

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce links to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce links to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie. See Sauce below.


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304


SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:
https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

⬆️⬆️⬆️
DID YOU Watch 20 seconds of the above sauce?
If not then you Will. Not. Understand.
Over 25 comments and only ONE additional view on the above clip that proves the entire OP.

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/

Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
63 score
Reason: None provided.

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce links to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce links to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie. See Sauce below.


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304


SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand.


Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:

https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/

Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
62 score
Reason: Format

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce links to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce links to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie. See Sauce below.


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304

SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will NOT understand.


Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:

https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/

Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
62 score
Reason: Updated for a lot more context. Does anyone check the sauce?

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

For context:
The key point in this post, and what all the sauce links are there to prove, is that THE WHITE SPECKLING on the video is an artifact of ionizing radiation hitting the camera sensor. (See Sauce links to understand)
These pixelations are telltale sign of a nuclear explosion. (See Sauce links to understand)

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie. See Sauce below.


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES vs NON-Nukes going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Anons need to be able to identify the use of nuclear weapons in real time as the videos are posted on social media. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion in Lebanon:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304

SAUCE: DO NOT SKIP or you will not understand.

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:

https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"RADIATION produces SPOTS IN THE IMAGE that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/

Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
56 score
Reason: Edit for clarity "2015"

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen in 2015. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie. See Sauce below.


The reason it is important for Anons to know HOW TO IDENTIFY video of NUKES going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304

SAUCE:

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:

https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"Radiation produces spots in the image that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/

Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
40 score
Reason: Original

The following post is outrageous, unbelievable, and absolutely true. Plenty of sauce links at the bottom.

The following is a short clip of more than one NUCLEAR bunker buster bombs exploding in Yemen. (estimated distance - 6 miles)

https://youtu.be/TueGsI2GXbw?si=xGoMv0WG1t0vaKGr

NOTE: **Starting @ 1:10 in the clip the WHITE SPECKLES appearing IN FRONT OF the close-by 'vertical pipe' looking things at the bottom center of the screen... This is ionizing radiation (likely neutrons) overloading the digital camera sensor. NOT speckles/Sparks 6 miles away at the explosion itself.
YES These are nukes.
NO the MSM would not have told you.
The camera speckles do not lie. See Sauce below.

Example of a huge, non-nuclear explosion:
https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1837544227443503304


SAUCE:

Controlled laboratory demonstration of the WHITE SPECKLE effect of ionizing radiation on a cell phone video:

https://youtu.be/MsG6JsMAJ_Q?si=T593AN8_R1etKC55

There is even an app that uses only the phone camera. In researching this, several websites claim to 'debunk' the idea that ionizing radiation shows up on a video taken with a digital camera.

"Radiation produces spots in the image that are caused by high energy particles hitting the CMOS-sensor. When the ray is absorbed by the electrons in the censor, they get exited and soon release their excess energy as a flash of light."
Source: https://www.nerdaxic.com/2014/09/01/how-ionizing-radiation-affects-cmos-sensor/

Neutron Bombs leave almost NO residual radiation.
"Since the neutron bomb produced little or no radioactive fallout or residual radiation, the target area could be reoccupied within a matter of hours."

Source: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-neutron-bomb/#:~:text=Since%20the%20neutron%20bomb%20produced,were%20few%20takers%20for%20it.

A good read on "clean" nuclear bombs:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Cohen


The reason this is important for Anons to know going forward is that I believe as things escalate in Ukraine and in the Middle East, these weapons will once again be showing themselves. Now you guys know how to tell the difference and separate bullshit from Truth.


For the shills and doubters:

Because many of my friends (and maybe some sleeper-shills) on here will automatically doubt my above assertion that nukes indeed have been used right in front of our faces previously, for deeply intellectual reasons such as "but that can't be true because we would definitely know about it," regardless of the extensive sauce, I have prepared a parallel post as some food for thought:

If I were a SHILL...
https://greatawakening.win/p/19957ciQap/

WWG1WGA!

2 days ago
1 score