Oct is going to be a big month in the Jan 6 case.

The judge allowed Jack Smith to file 180 page brief to explain our they are going to deal with the restrictions from the Supreme Court Immunity case.

She asked Smith to propose redactions and Trump to respond.

Trump's lawyers filing became public today. They had asked this be filed under seal. But the judge rejected that https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.248.0.pdf

The true motivation driving the efforts by the Special Counsel’s Office to disseminate witness statements that they previously sought to lock down is as obvious as it is inappropriate. The Office wants their politically motivated manifesto to be public, contrary to the Justice Manual and longstanding DOJ norms in cases not involving President Trump, in the final weeks of the 2024 Presidential election while early voting has already begun throughout the United States.

They say Smith redactions don't go far enough because they still include identifying info. They want Smith to redact

all references to the titles and positions held by the witnesses who are not specifically named in the Superseding Indictment

They also say previously Smith complained that revealing this info ran

risks of threats, intimidation, and harassment.

But now he wants it public.

Oct is going to be a big month in the Jan 6 case.

The judge allowed Jack Smith to file 180 page brief to explain our they are going to deal with the restrictions from the Supreme Court Immunity case.

She asked Smith to propose redactions and Trump to respond.

Trump's lawyers filed today

The true motivation driving the efforts by the Special Counsel’s Office to disseminate witness statements that they previously sought to lock down is as obvious as it is inappropriate. The Office wants their politically motivated manifesto to be public, contrary to the Justice Manual and longstanding DOJ norms in cases not involving President Trump, in the final weeks of the 2024 Presidential election while early voting has already begun throughout the United States.

They say Smith redactions don't go far enough because they still include identifying info. They want Smith to redact

all references to the titles and positions held by the witnesses who are not specifically named in the Superseding Indictment

They also say previously Smith complained that revealing this info ran

risks of threats, intimidation, and harassment.

But now he wants it public.