I would say to that, look at Q less like some information source, giving some kind of orders to his followers. Look at him more like someone doing the opposite. The point of his posts over the four years prepares people to just disect the media and what they are told. He never asks for you to believe what he/they post. Thats not the point of it. Anons are just people who dig past the narrative, and Q has shown a huge contrast between what information is being supressed over the last 4 years. Its like a headache remembering every debunked or false story. Its like a wakeup call to do your own research.

I have a feeling you think Q is the predictor and all he says must come true, but he doesnt predict, he questions which leads Anons to dig. Im not sure if thats nefarioust to some, but to me its made me go from believing everything i hear and parroting it to, watching hours of comittees and comparing to the media spin. THAT is the purpose of Q. Do you need proof he has succeeded?

I would say to that, look at Q less like some information source, giving some kind of orders to his followers. Look at him more like someone doing the opposite. The point of his posts over the four years prepares people to just disect the media and what they are told. He never asks for you to believe what he/they post. Thats not the point of it. Anons are just people who dig past the narrative, and Q has shown a huge contract between what information is being supressed over the last 4 years. Its like a headache remembering every debunked or false story. Its like a wakeup call to do your own research.

I have a feeling you think Q is the predictor and all he says must come true, but he doesnt predict, he questions which leads Anons to dig. Im not sure if thats nefarioust to some, but to me its made me go from believing everything i hear and parroting it to, watching hours of comittees and comparing to the media spin. THAT is the purpose of Q. Do you need proof he has succeeded?