Yeah, I've seen all this stuff. It's all nonsense.

The pizza code isn't a code. There's not a scrap of evidence to suggest it is.

Symbols and handkerchiefs stuff all involves common shapes and colours.

The Hampstead case was thrown out in court and doesn't remotely suggest any connection to the politicians routinely claimed to be part of this theory.

None of the above could be seen as evidence to any rational person UNLESS you start with the conclusion and work backwards.

And the guys who framed/promoted the conclusion have now been proven liars, so...???

Yeah, I've seen all this stuff. It's all nonsense.

The pizza code isn't a code. There's not a scrap of evidence to suggest they are.

Symbols and handkerchief all involve common shapes and colours.

The Hampstead case was thrown out in court and doesn't remotely suggest any connection to the politicians routinely claimed to be part of this theory.

None of the above could be seen as evidence to any rational person UNLESS you start with the conclusion and work backwards.

And the guys who framed/promoted the conclusion have now been proven liars, so...???

Yeah, I've seen all this stuff. It's all nonsense. The pizza code isn't a code. There's not a scrap of evidence to suggest they are. Symbols and handkerchief all involve common shapes and colours. The Hampstead case was thrown out in court and doesn't remotely suggest any connection to the politicians routinely claimed to be part of this theory. None of the above could be seen as evidence to any rational person UNLESS you start with the conclusion and work backwards. And the guys who framed/promoted the conclusion have now been proven liars, so...???

Yeah, I've seen all this stuff. It's all nonsense.

The pizza code isn't a code. There's not a scrap of evidence to suggest they are.

Symbols and handkerchief all involve common shapes.

The Hampstead case was thrown out in court and doesn't remotely suggest any connection to the politicians routinely claimed to be part of this theory.

None of the above could be seen as evidence to any rational person UNLESS you start with the conclusion and work backwards.

And the guys who framed/promoted the conclusion have now been proven liars, so...???