Normally, yes, could have been 5-4 decision and fourth Justice just chose not to put name on dissent, but here if four justices wanted to hear they would have, so only the three.

Edited because I forgot about four Justice standard.

Normally, yes, could have been 5-4 decision and fourth Justice just chose not to put name on dissent, but here if four justices wanted to hear they would have, so only the three.

Edited because I forgot about four Justice standard.

Yes, you’re right. Could have been a 5-4 decision but the 4th Justice didn’t choose to put his/her name on either dissent. There’s no way to know about that.

Yes, you’re right. Could have been a 5-4 decision but the 4th Justice didn’t choose to put his/her name on either dissent. There’s no way to know about that.