crazy algorithmic way he describes

What is 'crazy' about the algorithm doing the following things? :

1: Calculate the number of fake Biden votes needed to steal the state 2: Come up with ratios that can be forced on certain precincts (which, on average, are lower than the true ratios) 3: Shuffle the forced ratios among multiple precincts in order to hide the rigging 4: Keep the ratios evenly balanced to achieve the target % of Trump votes

Older voting machines did the same thing but just stole the same share of votes from each precinct without shuffling them. This is exactly what happened in New Hampshire.

I just don't think Solomon proves it with his crazy, unbelievably long-winded analysis

That is exactly why I was drawn to Edward Solomon. He demonstrates every single step of his calculations live on camera and hides nothing. He provides spreadsheets at every major step of the process.

If Solomon's livestreams are too long-winded for you, you can just watch his 'smoking gun' videos.

Voting tallies and the ratios they produce with counting schemes like those in Fulton and Philly occur in batches, often size 50 and 100

Doesn't matter that precincts don't have updates. Those ratios are NOT counted if there are no new updates. So the repeated ratios have NOTHING to do with the ratio not updating.

Also, does it take hours to count a stack of 50 or 100 ballots? That makes zero sense. Speaking of batches of 50 ballots, Solomon also analyzed the remainder of the final Trump votes of each precinct and they don't follow the expected distribution.

His ultimate argument is probabilistic, saying there is no way such ratio transfers could ever have occurred normally. That's a probability statement with a tacit reference to a uniform distribution

The distribution isn't even the strongest evidence. The strongest evidence is the fact that the ratios in GA and PA violated Euler's Totient Law from 1735. The Iowa 2016 caucus results did not violate that law. It doesn't matter if the people voted 90% Trump or 10% Trump; the ratios of the precincts much always obey that law. Otherwise it's rigged.

Finally, I'd challenge you to actually write his algorithm in some kind of reasonable coding language with a clear, concise explanation and logic, not with endless attention-seeking hours on spreadsheets and Starcraft. Good luck!

I've already started writing that algorithm. I'm mostly done with it. I'm using the TypeScript programming language. This project hasn't been very hard.

I just don't think Solomon proves it with his crazy, unbelievably long-winded analysis