Well the only reasonable thought would be that they wanted to write their own narrative, forcing people to testify to affirm the narrative they wrote. Who? Likely the same corrupt powers, the ones that have funded every war dating back to Napolean. Same people in charge of the central banking/federal reserve scam. Same people who wrote our history books to teach us only about how jews were 'targeted and systematically killed', without teaching us that in early 1900s, Russia was a predominantly white/christian nation, bolsheviks (some claim the bolsheviks to have been a jewish movement) went into Russia, murdering the Czar and his family, taking over and leading to Stalin, ect. and the Holodomor (the 'holocaust before the holocaust' - forced famine in Ukraine starving over 6 million people to death in the early 1930s). The Russians at the time were not only white and christian, they were Prussian-Germanic in descent, so whether or not Hitler and the Nazis actually gassed and killed Jews, obviously that would never be a good thing, but one starts to understand that there is prior history of Bolsheviks slaughtering those of german descent. The Nazis were insane in terms of recording everything, their plans, everything was intricately documented. For some reason there was not ever one document talking about the extermination of jewish people. Only Nuremberg trials that 'confirmed' that. Engineers also examined some concentration camps to find the 'gas chambers' had no piping that could've allowed gas into the chamber nor was it airtight.

Nothing of what I know is because of Q. I've been reseaeching for years, and research is the best when it is spurred by ones own self, instead of directed by others. Stalin once said, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it yourselves". Q is great for waking some people up, but honestly the information is all out there already. Imo Q is unnecessary, and until proven otherwise it is disinformation/misinformation and not to be trusted. At the end of the day, whether we believe in something like Q or not, does that actually effect the outcome?

Congress is 99.9% nothing more than people who work for the central banking scheme. They oppose eachother ONLY in front of the cameras. Their rhetoric is all an illusion. Look past it and look at any congress since the inception of the Fed in 1913. What they speak and what they do is ALWAYS two different things. The illusion of opposition is kept intact, while they continue to work together to fuck us behind closed doors and this is proven time and time again. Calling/hoping for congressmen to do the right thing is a lost cause.

Well the only reasonable thought would be that they wanted to write their own narrative, forcing people to testify to affirm the narrative they wrote. Who? Likely the same corrupt powers, the ones that have funded every war dating back to Napolean. Same people in charge of the central banking/federal reserve scam. Same people who wrote our history books to teach us only about how jews were 'targeted and systematically killed', without teaching us that in early 1900s, Russia was a predominantly white/christian nation, bolsheviks (some claim the bolsheviks to have been a jewish movement) went into Russia, murdering the Czar and his family, taking over and leading to Stalin, ect. and the Holodomor (the 'holocaust before the holocaust' - forced famine in Ukraine starving over 6 million people to death in the early 1930s). The Russians at the time were not only white and christian, they were Prussian-Germanic in descent, so whether or not Hitler and the Nazis actually gassed and killed Jews, obviously that would never be a good thing, but one starts to understand that there as history prior of people slaughtering those of german descent. The Nazis were insane in terms of recording everything, their plans, everything, and for some reason there was not ever one document talking about the extermination of jewish people. Only Nuremberg trials that 'confirmed' that. Engineers also examined some concentration camps to find the 'gas chambers' had no piping that could've allowed gas into the chamber nor was it airtight.

Nothing of what I know is because of Q. I've been reseaeching for years, and research is the best when it is spurred by ones own self, instead of directed by others. Stalin once said, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it yourselves". Q is great for waking some people up, but honestly the information is all out there already. Imo Q is unnecessary, and until proven otherwise it is disinformation/misinformation and not to be trusted. At the end of the day, whether we believe in something like Q or not, does that actually effect the outcome?

Congress is 99.9% nothing more than people who work for the central banking scheme. They oppose eachother ONLY in front of the cameras. Their rhetoric is all an illusion. Look past it and look at any congress since the inception of the Fed in 1913. What they speak and what they do is ALWAYS two different things. The illusion of opposition is kept intact, while they continue to work together to fuck us behind closed doors and this is proven time and time again. Calling/hoping for congressmen to do the right thing is a lost cause.