Just like any good card player won't show his hand, neither will any good lawyer show all of their evidence.

Chances are, whatever evidence Wood may drop on this "journalist," it will be evidence that is open source and readily available. Showing any other type of evidence will inherently taint any investigation or lawsuit. This "journalist" knows that, so does Wood. So, there's no way Wood shares anything more than what is already out there as open source knowledge. I bet the Normies will bite when this "journalist" "revisits" this article later in the future. Will probably wait a couple weeks, and once it's "apparent" Wood has no plans on answering, said "journo" will offer up a nice and neat little hit piece that confirms the bias against Wood. And the Normies will eat it up, too, hook, line, and sinker because it absolves them of any further critical thought as to the truth of our reality.

It's a shame, really. And it also highlights just how far we still have to go with this war.

Just like any good card player won't show his hand, neither will any good lawyer show all of their evidence.

Chances are, whatever evidence Wood may drop on this "journalist," it will be evidence that is open source and readily available. Showing any other type of evidence will inherently taint any investigation or lawsuit. This "journalist" knows that, so does Wood. So, there's no way Wood shares anything more than what is already out there as open source knowledge. And I bet the Normies will bite when this "journalist" "revisits" this article later in the future. Will probably wait a couple weeks, and once it's "apparent" Wood has no plans on answering, said "journo" will offer up a nice and neat little hit piece that confirms the bias against Wood. And yh Normies will eat it up hook, line, and sinker because it absolves them of any further critical thought as to the truth of our reality.

Just like any good card player won't show his hand, neither will any good lawyer show all of their evidence.

Chances are, whatever evidence Wood may drop on this "journalist," it will be evidence that is open source and readily available. Showing any other type of evidence will inherently taint any investigation or lawsuit. And this "journalist" knows what that and so will Wood. So, there's no way Wood shares anything more than what is already out there as open source knowledge.