Reason: None provided.
The funny thing is he wasted 19 characters by typing out "intellectual property" instead of using "IP" like he did previously in the tweet.
He then could have spelled out :
"to " (+2)
"manufacturing" (+10)
"with" (+3)
"before" (+4)
2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.
The funny thing is he wasted 19 characters by typing out "intellectual property" instead of using "IP" like he did previously in the tweet.
He then could have spelled out : "to " (+2)
"manufacturing" (+10)
"with" (+3)
"before" (+4)
2 years ago
3 score
Reason: Original
The funny thing is he wasted 19 characters by typing out "intellectual property" instead of using "IP" like he did previously in the tweet.
He then could have spelled out : "to " (+2) "manufacturing" (+10) "with" (+3) "before" (+4)
2 years ago
1 score