Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

This is the problem I am talking about. There is WAY too much info out there on multiple topics to absorb it all. Too much to learn, too little time to learn it.

So, I asked for a brief overview, but you only gave me a link to 3 videos to watch.

No time, man. Give me YOUR brief explanation.

If you really believe it is worth checking out, you should be able to explain it in a short paragraph or three.

Nobody has EVER done that, so I don't take it seriously. If the people who believe it can't give some sort of brief overview, then why should I bother diving into something that would take hours, if not much longer to really dig into it?

Especially, when it makes no sense on the surface level.

How can it be both day and night at the same time, on a flat surface?

Doesn't it necessarily mean the Sun revolves around the Earth in some way? If not, then how does it work?

I'm just asking for some basics to get me past the "not worth the time" that I am seeing.

We should of course be aware that much of what we have been taught is false. But that does not mean that EVERYTHING we've been taught is false. More importantly, it does not mean we should believe (or even spend much time on) pursuing EVERY possibility that someone can come up with.

The burden of proof is on he who makes the assertion.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This is the problem I am talking about. There is WAY too much info out there on multiple topics to absorb it all. Too much to learn, too little time to learn it.

So, I asked for a brief overview, but you only gave me a link to 3 videos to watch.

No time, man. Give me YOUR brief explanation.

If you really believe it is worth checking out, you should be able to explain it in a short paragraph or three.

Nobody has EVER done that, so I don't take it seriously. If the people who believe it can't give some sort of brief overview, then why should I bother diving into something that would take hours, if not much longer to really dig into it?

Especially, when it makes no sense on the surface level.

How can it be both day and night at the same time, on a flat surface?

Doesn't it necessarily mean the Sun revolves around the Earth in some why? If not, then how does it work?

I'm just asking for some basics to get me past the "not worth the time" that I am seeing.

We should of course be aware that much of what we have been taught is false. But that does not mean that EVERYTHING we've been taught is false. More importantly, it does not mean we should believe (or even spend much time on) pursuing EVERY possibility that someone can come up with.

The burden of proof is on he who makes the assertion.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This is the problem I am talking about. There is WAY too much info out there on multiple topics to absorb it all. Too much to learn, too little time to learn it.

So, I asked for a brief overview, but you only gave me a link to 3 videos to watch.

No time, man. Give me YOUR brief explanation.

If you really believe it is worth checking out, you should be able to explain it in a short paragraph or three.

Nobody has EVER done that, so I don't take it seriously. If the people who believe it can't give some sort of brief overview, then why should I bother diving into something that would take hours, if not much longer to really dig into it?

Especially, when it makes no sence on the surface level.

How can it be both day and night at the same time, on a flat surface?

Doesn't it necessarily mean the Sun revolves around the Earth in some why? If not, then how does it work?

I'm just asking for some basics to get me past the "not worth the time" that I am seeing.

We should of course be aware that much of what we have been taught is false. But that does not mean that EVERYTHING we've been taught is false. More importantly, it does not mean we should believe (or even spend much time on) pursuing EVERY possibility that someone can come up with.

The burden of proof is on he who makes the assertion.

2 years ago
1 score