What is Trump always pointing to?

ex: I want to curb mass illegal immigration -> dems: open borders!

I want to kick out MS-13 animals -> MS-13 are people too! Leave them alone.

I want to build a wall -> dems: No Wall!

I want to put tarrifs on China -> dems: No tariffs!

I want to have law and order -> dems: No Law and order

I want to support law enforcement -> dems: Defund Law Enforcement.

I want to protect the 2nd -> dems: Fuck the 2nd!

HCQ could be a gamechanger -> dems: No The shot is the only way

Maybe you can get cured by MMS -> dems: bleach is bad!

I want to have Right to try -> Dems: No right to try!

You see a pattern?

Trump: You take the shot if you want to. It's your choice -> Dems: The shots ..... we don't trust it. And besides: it should be mandatory.

See the pattern?

There is really no advantage in getting dragged into a discussion on potential deaths and the number of it, in relation to mandatory deaths and the number of it, superimposed on people by tyrannical institutions. It would be an exercise in cultural equivalence. And it lands you straight into the narrow and minute approved spectrum of discourse.

Freedom should be our basis to assess any situation.

What is Trump always pointing to?

ex: I want to curb mass illegal immigration -> dems: open borders!

I want to kick out MS-13 animals -> MS-13 are people too! Leave them alone.

I want to build a wall -> dems: No Wall!

I want to put tarrifs on China -> dems: No tariffs!

I want to have law and order -> dems: No Law and order

I want to support law enforcement -> dems: Defund Law Enforcement.

I want to protect the 2nd -> dems: Fuck the 2nd!

HCQ could be a gamechaner -> dems: No The shot is the only way

Maybe you can get cured by MMS -> dems: bleach is bad!

I want to have Right to try -> Dems: No right to try!

You see a pattern?

Trump: You take the shot if you want to. It's your choice -> Dems: The shots ..... we don't trust it. And besides: it should be mandatory.

See the pattern?

There is really no advantage in getting dragged into a discussion on potential deaths and the number of it, in relation to mandatory deaths and the number of it, superimposed on people by tyrannical institutions. It would be an exercise in cultural equivalence. And it lands you straight into the narrow and minute approved spectrum of discourse.

Freedom should be our basis to assess any situation.